Comparison Overview

Generali Italia

VS

Porto

Generali Italia

IT
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Generali Italia è la grande realtà assicurativa nata dalla fusione di Generali, Ina Assitalia, Toro, Lloyd Italico e Augusta. Dall’unione di persone e competenze che hanno fatto la storia dell’assicurazione in Italia, è nata una Compagnia con radici solide che guarda al futuro, in grado di offrire soluzioni sempre più innovative ed efficaci. Coniughiamo l’attenzione alle esigenze degli assicurati, alla solidità patrimoniale, all’esperienza e all’eccellenza tecnica del Gruppo Generali per accompagnare e proteggere i tuoi progetti di vita. Essere più grandi vuol dire anche diventare più forti: con l’esperienza di oltre 40 mila Agenti presenti capillarmente su tutto il territorio italiano oggi proteggiamo oltre 10 milioni di clienti. La sede principale di Generali Italia S.p.A. è in Via Marocchesa 14, 31021 Mogliano, Veneto, Italia

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,178
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 600 and 649

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos de negócio: Seguros, Saúde, Produtos Financeiros e Serviços. Além de 15.8 milhões de clientes únicos, 13 mil funcionários, 12 mil prestadores e 35 mil corretores parceiros, a empresa conta ainda com 101 sucursais e escritórios regionais em todo o Brasil. Ao todo 27 empresas fazem parte do universo Porto – entre elas: Porto Bank, Porto Saúde, Porto Seguro, Porto Serviço, Porto Seguro Uruguai, Azul Seguros, Itaú Seguros de Auto e Residência.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 23,491
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/generaliitalia.jpeg
Generali Italia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porto.jpeg
Porto
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Generali Italia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Porto
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Generali Italia in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.

Incident History — Generali Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Generali Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/generaliitalia.jpeg
Generali Italia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/porto.jpeg
Porto
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Generali Italia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Porto company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Porto company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Generali Italia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Porto company and Generali Italia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Porto company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Generali Italia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Porto company nor Generali Italia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Porto company nor Generali Italia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Generali Italia company nor Porto company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Porto company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Generali Italia company.

Porto company employs more people globally than Generali Italia company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Generali Italia nor Porto holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.