Comparison Overview

General Press Corporation

VS

CleanMark

General Press Corporation

110 Allegheny Dr, Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania, 15065, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://generalpress.com

General Press is a premier cut and stack label supplier. We are a full-service labeling company that specialize in IML (injection molded labels), blow mold, and paper labels. We produce a wide variety of labels for the food, beverage, and automotive industries. Our capabilities allow us to print on a variety of plastic and paper substrates. Our finishing services include die-cutting for special shapes for your branding. We provide the highest quality labeling for products of every kind, from startups to leading national and international brands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CleanMark

6700 SW Bradbury Ct, Portland, OR, 97224, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cleanmarklabels.com/

CleanMark Labels is the industry leader in providing innovative and reliable labeling solutions tailored for cleanroom environments and demanding industrial applications. Our extensive expertise and commitment to excellence enable us to support the critical work of leading companies in semiconductor, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other high-tech sectors. By partnering with companies such as Intel, Micron, Lam Research, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Pfizer, we ensure that our labels meet the highest standards of performance, compliance, and durability. Additionally, our durable labeling solutions are engineered to withstand extreme conditions such as ultra-low temperatures, high heat, and exposure to harsh chemicals, ensuring reliable performance in the most challenging environments. Known for our consultative approach, we work closely with our customers to understand their unique needs and solve the toughest label challenges. Our mission is to empower our customers to focus on their groundbreaking work by delivering labeling solutions that are as dependable and precise as their innovations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-press-corp-.jpeg
General Press Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Press Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CleanMark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Press Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CleanMark in 2025.

Incident History — General Press Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Press Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CleanMark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CleanMark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-press-corp-.jpeg
General Press Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cleanmark-labels.jpeg
CleanMark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

General Press Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CleanMark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CleanMark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to General Press Corporation company.

In the current year, CleanMark company and General Press Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CleanMark company nor General Press Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor General Press Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CleanMark company nor General Press Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither General Press Corporation company nor CleanMark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither General Press Corporation company nor CleanMark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CleanMark company employs more people globally than General Press Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Press Corporation nor CleanMark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References