Comparison Overview

General Motors

VS

Volvo Cars

General Motors

100 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan, US, 48243
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gm.com

General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and the technology to realize the safer, better and more sustainable world we want. As an open, inclusive company, we’re also creating an environment where everyone feels welcomed and valued for who they are. One team, where all ideas are considered and heard, where everyone can contribute to their fullest potential, with a culture based in respect, integrity, accountability and equality. Our team brings wide-ranging perspectives and experiences to solving the complex transportation challenges of today and tomorrow. For information on the GM Privacy Statement, please visit http://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 103,855
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Volvo Cars

Assar Gabrielssons väg, Göteborg, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://volvocars.com

Everything we do starts with people. Our purpose is to provide freedom to move, in a personal, sustainable and safe way. We are committed to simplifying our customers’ lives by offering better technology solutions that improve their impact on the world and bringing the most advanced mobility innovations to protect them, their loved ones and the people around them. Volvo Cars’ continued success is the result of a collaborative, diverse, and inclusive working environment. The people of Volvo Cars are committed to making a difference in our world. Today, we are one of the most well-known and respected car brands, with over 40,000 employees across the globe. We believe in bringing out the best in each other and harnessing the true power of people. At Volvo Cars your career is designed around your talents and aspirations so you can reach your full potential. Join us on a journey of a lifetime as we create safety, autonomous driving and electrification technologies of tomorrow. Read about our privacy policy here: http://volvoca.rs/privacy

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 23,024
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-motors.jpeg
General Motors
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvocars.jpeg
Volvo Cars
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Motors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Volvo Cars
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

General Motors has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volvo Cars in 2025.

Incident History — General Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Volvo Cars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Cars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-motors.jpeg
General Motors
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of on-board ports
Motivation: High horsepower and resale value
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvocars.jpeg
Volvo Cars
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Database access, CICD access, Atlassian access, Domain access, WiFi hotspots and logins, Auth bearers, API access, PAC security access
Motivation: Monetary gain through data sale
Blog: Blog

FAQ

General Motors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Cars company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

General Motors company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Volvo Cars company.

In the current year, General Motors company has reported more cyber incidents than Volvo Cars company.

Neither Volvo Cars company nor General Motors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Volvo Cars company and General Motors company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

General Motors company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Volvo Cars company has not reported such incidents publicly.

General Motors company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Volvo Cars company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Volvo Cars company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to General Motors company.

General Motors company employs more people globally than Volvo Cars company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Motors nor Volvo Cars holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References