Comparison Overview

General Mills

VS

Vorwerk Group

General Mills

One General Mills Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US, 55426
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.generalmills.com

We exist to make food the world loves. But we do more than that. General Mills is a place that prioritizes being a force for good, a place to expand learning, explore new perspectives and reimagine new possibilities, every day. We look for people who want to bring their best—bold thinkers with big hearts who challenge one other and grow together. Because becoming the undisputed leader in food means surrounding ourselves with people who are hungry for what’s next.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 24,724
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Vorwerk Group

Rauental 38, None, Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE, 42289
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://corporate.vorwerk.com/en/home/

For more than 140 years, Vorwerk has been an internationally active family-owned company focused on improving life everywhere we call home. Our superior products and services come with a human touch, from the way we develop and sell them, to the way they are used. Vorwerk is the number-one direct sales company in Europe, and a worldwide leader in direct sales of high-quality household devices. Today, over 108.000 people in more than 61 countries work for us and help us generate an overall revenue of 3.17 million euros (excl. turnover tax; 2024). Our products, which we develop, manufacture and successfully distribute include Thermomix® / Bimby® as well as the Kobold / Folletto vacuum cleaners. The akf group is also part of the Vorwerk family.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 11,489
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-mills.jpeg
General Mills
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vorwerk-&-co--kg.jpeg
Vorwerk Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Mills
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vorwerk Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Mills in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vorwerk Group in 2025.

Incident History — General Mills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Mills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vorwerk Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vorwerk Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-mills.jpeg
General Mills
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vorwerk-&-co--kg.jpeg
Vorwerk Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

General Mills company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vorwerk Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

General Mills company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Vorwerk Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Vorwerk Group company and General Mills company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vorwerk Group company nor General Mills company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

General Mills company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Vorwerk Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Vorwerk Group company nor General Mills company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither General Mills company nor Vorwerk Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vorwerk Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to General Mills company.

General Mills company employs more people globally than Vorwerk Group company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Mills nor Vorwerk Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References