Comparison Overview

General Mechanical Expertise and Services

VS

G.D S.p.A.

General Mechanical Expertise and Services

Spencer Chowk,, Pune, Maharashtra, 411052, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gmexpertise.in

GM Expertise & Services was established as a computer aided engineering (CAE) company to provide performance enrichment as well as product development solutions to worldwide clients. We are experienced in using cutting edge technologies which includes computational fluid dynamics, computational electromagnetics and finite element analysis. We also carry out piping and structural stress analysis for the benefit of our clienteles. Furthermore we are planning to explore in the genera of Plant Engineering and Resource Management Services to give an all-round package/facility to our patrons.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

G.D S.p.A.

Via Battindarno 91, Bologna, undefined, 40133, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gidi.it

G.D is the leading supplier of high-technology machinery for cigarette making and packing, filter production, other tobacco products and special products. Thanks to its extensive range of machines available, G.D is the only manufacturer of complete high-speed lines and of a wide range of solutions for the tobacco industry. With its headquarter in Bologna, Italy and thanks to its worldwide branches and service centers, G.D provides an extensive sales and service network to be always close to customers. G.D is part of Coesia, a group of innovation-based industrial solution companies operating globally, headquartered in Bologna, Italy.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,231
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-mechanical-expertise-&-services.jpeg
General Mechanical Expertise and Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g-d-s-p-a-.jpeg
G.D S.p.A.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Mechanical Expertise and Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
G.D S.p.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Mechanical Expertise and Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G.D S.p.A. in 2025.

Incident History — General Mechanical Expertise and Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Mechanical Expertise and Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — G.D S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G.D S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-mechanical-expertise-&-services.jpeg
General Mechanical Expertise and Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g-d-s-p-a-.jpeg
G.D S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

G.D S.p.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to General Mechanical Expertise and Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, G.D S.p.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to General Mechanical Expertise and Services company.

In the current year, G.D S.p.A. company and General Mechanical Expertise and Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor General Mechanical Expertise and Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor General Mechanical Expertise and Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor General Mechanical Expertise and Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services company nor G.D S.p.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

G.D S.p.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to General Mechanical Expertise and Services company.

G.D S.p.A. company employs more people globally than General Mechanical Expertise and Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Mechanical Expertise and Services nor G.D S.p.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References