Comparison Overview

General Dynamics Information Technology

VS

Sutherland

General Dynamics Information Technology

undefined, Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

GDIT is a global technology and professional services company that delivers solutions, technology and mission services to every major agency across the U.S. government, defense and intelligence community. Our 30,000 experts extract the power of technology to create immediate value and deliver solutions at the edge of innovation. We operate across 50+ countries worldwide, offering leading capabilities in digital modernization, AI/ML, Cloud, Cyber and application development. GDIT is part of General Dynamics, a global aerospace and defense company. We have shared our clients’ sense of purpose for over half a century and have a have a unique understanding of their missions, complex environments, and a rapidly changing world. Together with our clients, we strive to create a safer, smarter world by harnessing the power of deep expertise and advanced technology.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 25,548
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sutherland

1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, 14534, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud engineering. Advanced analytics. For business leaders, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. At Sutherland, we are a leading global business and digital transformation partner. Our services span a diversified range of categories, from Healthcare, Insurance, Banking & Financial Services, Communications, Media & Entertainment, Technology, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics, Retail, Energy & Utilities. We work with iconic brands worldwide, and we bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading technology and business process excellence. We’ve created over 200 unique inventions under several patents across AI and other critical technologies. Leveraging our advanced products and platforms, we drive digital transformation, optimize critical business operations, reinvent experiences and pioneer new solutions, all provided through a seamless “as a service” model. Inside Sutherland, our commitment goes beyond technology. We are a talented team of 38,000+ people working in more than 60 global delivery centers. Each and every one of us is passionate about technology and committed to results. For each company, we provide new keys for their businesses, the people they work with, and the customers they serve. We tailor proven and rapid formulas to fit their unique DNA. We bring together human expertise and artificial intelligence. In short, we do digital chemistry. It unlocks new possibilities, great client partnerships, and transformative outcomes. Sutherland Unlocking digital performance. Delivering measurable results. Know more: www.sutherlandglobal.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 56,636
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics-information-technology.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global-services.jpeg
Sutherland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
General Dynamics Information Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutherland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Dynamics Information Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Sutherland has 78.57% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — General Dynamics Information Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Dynamics Information Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/general-dynamics-information-technology.jpeg
General Dynamics Information Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global-services.jpeg
Sutherland
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Computers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

General Dynamics Information Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutherland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sutherland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas General Dynamics Information Technology company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sutherland company has reported more cyber incidents than General Dynamics Information Technology company.

Neither Sutherland company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sutherland company has disclosed at least one data breach, while General Dynamics Information Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sutherland company nor General Dynamics Information Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology company nor Sutherland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sutherland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to General Dynamics Information Technology company.

Sutherland company employs more people globally than General Dynamics Information Technology company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither General Dynamics Information Technology nor Sutherland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H