Comparison Overview

Gemeente Harlingen

VS

Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc.

Gemeente Harlingen

Postbus 10.000, Harlingen, NL, 8860 HA
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

Grenzend aan het Werelderfgoed de Waddenzee is Harlingen de enige Friese stad aan zee. Een stoere magneet voor wie houdt van wind en water. Maar nét zo aantrekkelijk voor liefhebbers van een roemrijk verleden. Prachtige pakhuizen, levendige binnenhavens en sfeervolle straatjes, originele galeries én een bruisend winkelaanbod maken Harlingen behalve zilt ook zalig. De gemeente Harlingen telt ongeveer 16.000 inwoners en bestaat naast de stad Harlingen uit de dorpen Wijnaldum en Midlum. Harlingen- Welkom aan Zee!

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 227
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc.

6191 EXECUTIVE BLVD, ROCKVILLE, Maryland, 20852, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1978, the Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that develops new ideas to reduce illegal drug use. Non-partisan and non-political, IBH serves as a catalyst for change. IBH facilitates creative public and private sector collaboration to achieve this important public health goal. The mission of IBH is to reduce the use of illegal drugs and improve prevention and treatment. We work to achieve this mission by conducting research, promoting ideas that are affordable and scalable, linking with other individuals and groups to create synergies, and presenting new ideas at national meetings and in the media and by writing papers and reports that appear in leading journals and publications. This activity is managed and produced by the small and productive IBH staff, working with a uniquely talented and dedicated group of advisers and allies. While much of our work is original, IBH claims no ownership. IBH emphasizes collaboration and coalition-building. The result is our continued leadership in drug research and policy.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeenteharlingen.jpeg
Gemeente Harlingen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-behavior-and-health-inc.jpeg
Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gemeente Harlingen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Harlingen in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Gemeente Harlingen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Harlingen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeenteharlingen.jpeg
Gemeente Harlingen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-for-behavior-and-health-inc.jpeg
Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gemeente Harlingen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gemeente Harlingen company.

In the current year, Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company and Gemeente Harlingen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company nor Gemeente Harlingen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company nor Gemeente Harlingen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company nor Gemeente Harlingen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen company nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen company nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Harlingen company employs more people globally than Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gemeente Harlingen nor Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H