Comparison Overview

Gemeente Zoetermeer

VS

Instituto Alana

Gemeente Zoetermeer

Stadhuisplein 1, Zoetermeer, 2711, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Centraal gelegen in de randstad heeft de gemeente Zoetermeer ruim 120.000 inwoners. Met 51.000 arbeidsplaatsen, waarvan 6.200 in de ICTsector, en een hoog opgeleide beroepsbevolking van 58.000 personen, kent Zoetermeer een aantrekkelijk ondernemersklimaat. Zoetermeerders waarderen hun stad om het woongenot en de uitstekende voorzieningen, waaronder landelijk aansprekende leisurevoorzieningen. Ruim een kwart van de stad is groen en water.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1,471
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Instituto Alana

Rua Fradique Coutinho, 50, São Paulo, 05416-000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Somos uma organização da sociedade civil, sem fins lucrativos, cuja missão é "honrar a criança". Fazemos um trabalho nacional de advocacy com foco em questões sensíveis para a vivência plena da infância e nos estruturamos a partir de quatro eixos: comunicação, educação, relações governamentais e ações jurídicas. Atuamos por meio de programas e plataformas, que podem ser acessados em www.alana.org.br.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-zoetermeer.jpeg
Gemeente Zoetermeer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-alana.jpeg
Instituto Alana
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gemeente Zoetermeer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instituto Alana
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Zoetermeer in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instituto Alana in 2025.

Incident History — Gemeente Zoetermeer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Zoetermeer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instituto Alana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instituto Alana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-zoetermeer.jpeg
Gemeente Zoetermeer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instituto-alana.jpeg
Instituto Alana
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Zoetermeer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Instituto Alana company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Instituto Alana company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gemeente Zoetermeer company.

In the current year, Instituto Alana company and Gemeente Zoetermeer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Instituto Alana company nor Gemeente Zoetermeer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Instituto Alana company nor Gemeente Zoetermeer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Instituto Alana company nor Gemeente Zoetermeer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer company nor Instituto Alana company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer company nor Instituto Alana company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Zoetermeer company employs more people globally than Instituto Alana company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gemeente Zoetermeer nor Instituto Alana holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H