Comparison Overview

Gemeente Lelystad

VS

The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development

Gemeente Lelystad

Stadhuisplein 2, Postbus 91, Lelystad, Provincie Flevoland, NL, 8200 AB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lelystad.nl

Lelystad, hoofdstad van de provincie Flevoland, bestaat sinds 1967. Met nu 80.000 inwoners en de ambitie om door te groeien naar 100.000 inwoners plus de daarbij horende 35.000 tot 40.000 arbeidsplaatsen is Lelystad altijd bezig met vooruitgang. Enthousiaste en gemotiveerde medewerkers van gemeente Lelystad zorgen er dagelijks voor dat de toekomstplannen die bij ons op de agenda staan ook daadwerkelijk gerealiseerd kunnen worden. De ligging en steeds betere bereikbaarheid via weg (A6), spoor (Flevo- en Hanzelijn), water (vaarweg A’dam-Lemmer) en lucht (Lelystad Airport) en de aanwezigheid van Nationaal Park Nieuwland met onder meer Oostvaardersplassen en Marker Wadden maken Lelystad tot Hoofdstad van de Nieuwe Natuur en tot een stad die volop in beweging is.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 560
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://dity.gov.ua/

The Coordination Center for the Family Upbringing and Childcare Development is an advisory body of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and was established at the initiative of President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy, First Lady Olena Zelenska and with the support of President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen. The goal of the Center is to help create a system to ensure the right of every child to grow up in a family environment.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-lelystad.jpeg
Gemeente Lelystad
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-coordination-center-for-family-upbringing-and-child-care-development.jpeg
The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gemeente Lelystad
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Lelystad in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development in 2025.

Incident History — Gemeente Lelystad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Lelystad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-lelystad.jpeg
Gemeente Lelystad
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-coordination-center-for-family-upbringing-and-child-care-development.jpeg
The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Lelystad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gemeente Lelystad company.

In the current year, The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company and Gemeente Lelystad company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company nor Gemeente Lelystad company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company nor Gemeente Lelystad company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company nor Gemeente Lelystad company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad company nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad company nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Lelystad company employs more people globally than The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gemeente Lelystad nor The Coordination Center for Family Upbringing and Child Care Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References