Comparison Overview

GEEKSPIN

VS

OpenFOAM Journal

GEEKSPIN

245 E 37th St, New York, undefined, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://geekspin.co

Tech, trends and all the geekiness you can shake a lightsaber at. GEEKSPIN is a New York City based publisher focused on bringing tech, lifestyle and viral content to a geeky audience. We embrace the cosplayers, the Android fanboys, LEGO builders, unicorn lovers, trekkies, science nerds, the early adopters, foodies, and the Disney princess fans, because we are them.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

OpenFOAM Journal

Online presence, OO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
https://journal.openfoam.com/index.php/ofj

The OpenFOAM® Journal aims at publishing works related to the OpenFOAM® computational library, with a focus on the benefit for the OpenFOAM® community, is free to publish and open-access. Each publication has an associated discussion forum, to increase the interaction between the readers and the authors, and the overall impact of the contributions. The journal has a strong focus on reproducibility. Authors are required to present their results in a reproducible form, preferably by sharing codes and case setups used to generate their results, or alternatively by describing numerical settings, solver modifications, etc., in a sufficient level of detail.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geekspin.jpeg
GEEKSPIN
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openfoam-journal.jpeg
OpenFOAM Journal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GEEKSPIN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OpenFOAM Journal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEEKSPIN in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OpenFOAM Journal in 2025.

Incident History — GEEKSPIN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEEKSPIN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OpenFOAM Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OpenFOAM Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geekspin.jpeg
GEEKSPIN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/openfoam-journal.jpeg
OpenFOAM Journal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OpenFOAM Journal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GEEKSPIN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OpenFOAM Journal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GEEKSPIN company.

In the current year, OpenFOAM Journal company and GEEKSPIN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OpenFOAM Journal company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OpenFOAM Journal company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OpenFOAM Journal company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GEEKSPIN company nor OpenFOAM Journal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

OpenFOAM Journal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GEEKSPIN company.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor OpenFOAM Journal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References