Comparison Overview

GEEKSPIN

VS

Gildan Media

GEEKSPIN

245 E 37th St, New York, undefined, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://geekspin.co

Tech, trends and all the geekiness you can shake a lightsaber at. GEEKSPIN is a New York City based publisher focused on bringing tech, lifestyle and viral content to a geeky audience. We embrace the cosplayers, the Android fanboys, LEGO builders, unicorn lovers, trekkies, science nerds, the early adopters, foodies, and the Disney princess fans, because we are them.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gildan Media

6 Business Park Rd, Old Saybrook, 06475, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://gildanmedia.com

Gildan Media is an RBmedia company. RBmedia is owned by KKR, a leading global investment firm, and employs nearly 500 people. Welcome to Gildan Media, home of the best in personal development. We bring you both new and established authors as well as innovative learning methods to help you become a more productive person in all aspects of your life.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geekspin.jpeg
GEEKSPIN
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gildan-media-corp.jpeg
Gildan Media
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GEEKSPIN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gildan Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEEKSPIN in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gildan Media in 2025.

Incident History — GEEKSPIN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEEKSPIN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gildan Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gildan Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geekspin.jpeg
GEEKSPIN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gildan-media-corp.jpeg
Gildan Media
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gildan Media company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GEEKSPIN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gildan Media company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GEEKSPIN company.

In the current year, Gildan Media company and GEEKSPIN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gildan Media company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gildan Media company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gildan Media company nor GEEKSPIN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GEEKSPIN company nor Gildan Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GEEKSPIN company nor Gildan Media company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gildan Media company employs more people globally than GEEKSPIN company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GEEKSPIN nor Gildan Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References