Comparison Overview

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.

VS

The Children's Law Center

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.

1318 Route 31 N., None, Annandale, NJ, US, 08801
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The law firm of Gebhardt & Kiefer, PC is built on a legacy of professionalism, expertise, and client-centered service. Our knowledge spans numerous areas of law, and we can help you find solutions to your legal issues in the following practice areas: - Personal Injury - Divorce/Family Law - Wills, Estates, Trusts & Probate - Employment Law - Civil Litigation - Business Law & Commercial Litigation - Real Estate - Land Use and Development - Income Tax Planning - Income Tax Controversy - New Jersey Workers' Compensation - Civil Rights Violations - Local Government Representation While many New Jersey law firms have come and gone, Gebhardt & Kiefer has been a respected member of the legal community in central and northwestern New Jersey since 1884. Since our firm's founding in 1884, the attorneys of Gebhardt & Kiefer have represented individuals and business owners in nearly all of the legal issues they encounter, from starting a business, to obtaining fair compensation for an injury, to divorce, to buying a home. Our firm also represents a number of municipalities throughout New Jersey. While we are the largest law firm in Hunterdon County, NJ, and offer the resources of a large firm, we believe that law is best practiced in a close working relationship between the attorney and the client. We value personal relationships and work to build a high level of continuity, trust and comfort in our clients. Our firm has served generations of clients in central and northwestern New Jersey. The majority of our work comes to us by way of referrals from clients we have successfully represented. Attorney advertising. See Gebhardt & Kiefer website for full disclaimer: http://www.gklegal.com/disclaimer/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Children's Law Center

44 Court Street, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The mission of The Children’s Law Center ("CLC"​) is to provide children with a strong and effective voice in legal proceedings that have a critical impact on children’s lives. CLC represents children in custody/visitation, guardianship, domestic violence and connected child protective cases. At CLC, our core values are: • to provide high quality representation; • to provide children with supportive, informed and passionate advocates who give voice to their unique needs Our Client Values are: • Communicate our client’s voice • High quality representation • Integrate legal representation with social work • Listen to our clients • Develop the client’s sense of participation How Can I Help? The most direct and immediate way to help the children we represent at CLC is to provide financial support so that our attorneys and social workers can continue their vital work on critical issues that impact the lives of thousands of children involved in the court system. Contested custody, visitation and guardianship cases can be extremely traumatic for a child. Due to the elimination, or lack of availability of critical therapeutic and parenting services, and an overburdened Family Court, CLC’s clients benefit from our advocacy more than ever before. To learn how you can help CLC achieve it's mission please go to http://www.clcny.org/?page_id=6

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gebhardt-&-kiefer-p.c..jpeg
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-law-center.jpeg
The Children's Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Children's Law Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Children's Law Center in 2025.

Incident History — Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Children's Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Children's Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gebhardt-&-kiefer-p.c..jpeg
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-children's-law-center.jpeg
The Children's Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Children's Law Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Children's Law Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company.

In the current year, The Children's Law Center company and Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Children's Law Center company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Children's Law Center company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Children's Law Center company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company nor The Children's Law Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company nor The Children's Law Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Children's Law Center company employs more people globally than Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor The Children's Law Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X