Comparison Overview

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.

VS

Capitan Law

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.

1318 Route 31 N., None, Annandale, NJ, US, 08801
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The law firm of Gebhardt & Kiefer, PC is built on a legacy of professionalism, expertise, and client-centered service. Our knowledge spans numerous areas of law, and we can help you find solutions to your legal issues in the following practice areas: - Personal Injury - Divorce/Family Law - Wills, Estates, Trusts & Probate - Employment Law - Civil Litigation - Business Law & Commercial Litigation - Real Estate - Land Use and Development - Income Tax Planning - Income Tax Controversy - New Jersey Workers' Compensation - Civil Rights Violations - Local Government Representation While many New Jersey law firms have come and gone, Gebhardt & Kiefer has been a respected member of the legal community in central and northwestern New Jersey since 1884. Since our firm's founding in 1884, the attorneys of Gebhardt & Kiefer have represented individuals and business owners in nearly all of the legal issues they encounter, from starting a business, to obtaining fair compensation for an injury, to divorce, to buying a home. Our firm also represents a number of municipalities throughout New Jersey. While we are the largest law firm in Hunterdon County, NJ, and offer the resources of a large firm, we believe that law is best practiced in a close working relationship between the attorney and the client. We value personal relationships and work to build a high level of continuity, trust and comfort in our clients. Our firm has served generations of clients in central and northwestern New Jersey. The majority of our work comes to us by way of referrals from clients we have successfully represented. Attorney advertising. See Gebhardt & Kiefer website for full disclaimer: http://www.gklegal.com/disclaimer/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capitan Law

38 Regency Plaza, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania, 19342, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Our disability insurance lawyers fight to protect the rights of disabled individuals against insurance companies in group long term disability, individual disability, and group short term disability insurance matters. We have successfully represented the disabled against insurance companies such as New York Life (Life Insurance Company of North America), Lincoln, Prudential, MetLife, Hartford, Liberty Mutual, Unum, and many more. We are America's trusted disability insurance lawyers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gebhardt-&-kiefer-p.c..jpeg
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longtermdisabilitylawyers.jpeg
Capitan Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capitan Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitan Law in 2025.

Incident History — Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capitan Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitan Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gebhardt-&-kiefer-p.c..jpeg
Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longtermdisabilitylawyers.jpeg
Capitan Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capitan Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capitan Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company.

In the current year, Capitan Law company and Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capitan Law company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capitan Law company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capitan Law company nor Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company nor Capitan Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company nor Capitan Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. company employs more people globally than Capitan Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gebhardt & Kiefer, P.C. nor Capitan Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X