Comparison Overview

Kyo

VS

Autism Behavior Intervention

Kyo

295 89th St, Daly City, California, 94015, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Kyo, we exist to help create a life that’s more fulfilling for our clients, for ourselves, and for each other. We thrive on big, extraordinary challenges where super ideas originate, and believe that scientific discovery needs empathy in order to be effective and influential. We are for the driven, open, and ambitious looking to make an impact in their community. We believe in making every minute count when we’re together, and will strive to help you do the same while we’re apart. Together, we will change what is possible for those with autism.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 895
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Autism Behavior Intervention

17203 Ventura Blvd., Suite 3, Encino, CA 91316, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

At Autism Behavior Intervention (ABI), we provide state-of-the art, therapeutic programs to children and adolescents across the autism spectrum to help each individual learn to communicate, play, and socially interact, while reducing and replacing challenging behaviors. ABI's mission is to provide high quality, scientifically-proven treatment based on the principles of applied behavior analysis that meets the unique needs of each child. Led by executive directors Marla Saltzman, Ph.D. BCBA-D and Maureen Moore, MA, BCBA, ABI has been serving families in the greater Los Angeles area since 2005. ABI is contracted with most major health insurance plans, as well as multiple school districts and regional centers. Please visit our website at www.TeamABI.com for more information regarding our practice. Serving clients in the San Fernando Valley, Santa Clarita Valley, Burbank, Glendale, and Central and West Los Angeles, ABI is always seeking passionate and committed clinicians to join our team. At ABI, we pride ourselves on our commitment to ethics, teamwork, clinical quality, professional development, and work-life balance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-learning-group.jpeg
Kyo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-behavior-intervention.jpeg
Autism Behavior Intervention
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kyo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Autism Behavior Intervention
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kyo in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autism Behavior Intervention in 2026.

Incident History — Kyo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Autism Behavior Intervention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autism Behavior Intervention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-learning-group.jpeg
Kyo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autism-behavior-intervention.jpeg
Autism Behavior Intervention
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Autism Behavior Intervention company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kyo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Autism Behavior Intervention company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kyo company.

In the current year, Autism Behavior Intervention company and Kyo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Autism Behavior Intervention company nor Kyo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Autism Behavior Intervention company nor Kyo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Autism Behavior Intervention company nor Kyo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kyo company nor Autism Behavior Intervention company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kyo company nor Autism Behavior Intervention company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kyo company employs more people globally than Autism Behavior Intervention company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kyo nor Autism Behavior Intervention holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N