Comparison Overview

Gat Creek

VS

Cosh Living

Gat Creek

5270 Valley Road, None, Berkeley Springs, WV, US, 25411
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gatcreek.com

Gat Creek is a wood furniture manufacturer in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia. The company's dining room, bedroom, living room and home office products are made to order in a choice of Appalachian hardwoods: ash, cherry, maple and walnut and classic and hand-glazed paints. Clean, timeless silhouettes define the Gat Creek look. As single pieces or groups, the company's designs effortlessly connect between a range of styles - traditional, vintage or modern. Strongly committed to sustainable manufacturing and products, customers can take comfort in knowing that Gat Creek is built using materials that are safe for your family, our employees and the environment we all share.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cosh Living

Level 6, 600 Church St , Richmond, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://coshliving.com.au

At Cosh Living, we curate beautiful collections of designer furniture and accessories for indoors & out. Established in Melbourne in 2008, we work alongside European and local Australian brands to deliver timeless, exceptional furniture. At Cosh Living, our clients can consider furniture for all areas of the home, knowing that it will follow seamlessly from inside to outside with comfort, quality & style. We specialise in servicing the high-end residential and commercial market sectors, building great relationships with the general public and the Australian architectural and design community. Cosh are the exclusive Australian distributors for leading international furniture brands Tribu, Dedon, Atelier Vierkant and Potocco, as well as Australian brands Kett and Rakumba.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gatcreek.jpeg
Gat Creek
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cosh-living.jpeg
Cosh Living
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gat Creek
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cosh Living
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gat Creek in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cosh Living in 2025.

Incident History — Gat Creek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gat Creek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cosh Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cosh Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gatcreek.jpeg
Gat Creek
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cosh-living.jpeg
Cosh Living
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gat Creek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cosh Living company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cosh Living company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gat Creek company.

In the current year, Cosh Living company and Gat Creek company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cosh Living company nor Gat Creek company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cosh Living company nor Gat Creek company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cosh Living company nor Gat Creek company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gat Creek company nor Cosh Living company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gat Creek company nor Cosh Living company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cosh Living company employs more people globally than Gat Creek company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gat Creek nor Cosh Living holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References