Comparison Overview

Garnett Sign Studio

VS

graphics

Garnett Sign Studio

441 Victory Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Garnett Sign Studio is a custom fabricator of interior and exterior signs used in Hotels, Multi-Family Housing, Healthcare, Retail Environments, and Commercial/Corporate/Government facilities. We are best known for tactile and Braille signs that comply with the ADA, and for interior signage designed and manufactured with a flair beyond the ordinary. In addition, we produce logo signs, entry signs, evacuation maps, donor boards, code signs, directionals, cubicle signs, room and office identification signs, directories and menu boards.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

graphics

US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Clippingpathmaster is an online Clipping Path service provider, which remove image background for web and print usage. We have professional graphic designers and deliver images in outstanding quality within 1-24 hours. All designers of Clippingpathmaster manually create Photoshop clipping path, masking, image retouching , web design, and desktop publishing software. Clippingpathmaster offers one ($1) US dollar any kinds of clipping path within 12 hours & Free trial for quality evaluation before sending a job.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1,499
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garnett-sign-studio.jpeg
Garnett Sign Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphics.jpeg
graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Garnett Sign Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Garnett Sign Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Garnett Sign Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garnett Sign Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garnett-sign-studio.jpeg
Garnett Sign Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphics.jpeg
graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Garnett Sign Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Garnett Sign Studio company.

In the current year, graphics company and Garnett Sign Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither graphics company nor Garnett Sign Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither graphics company nor Garnett Sign Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither graphics company nor Garnett Sign Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio company nor graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio company nor graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

graphics company employs more people globally than Garnett Sign Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Garnett Sign Studio nor graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X