Comparison Overview

GarloWard, P.C.

VS

Philadelphia Bar Foundation

GarloWard, P.C.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Garlo Ward is a law firm for health care providers, businesses and employers. Our clients include long term care, retirement, home health care and assisted living providers, ICF-MRs, physicians and other health care providers. We also represent other small businesses with their issues such as contracts, transactions and employee issues. We are equipped to address all of the legal concerns that arise in the course of owning and operating a health care or other type of business. Specifically we assist our clients with the following types of issues: Regulatory and Governmental Matters Litigation Defense Labor & Employment Transactional Services

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Philadelphia Bar Foundation

1101 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Through programs, grants, and partnerships, the Philadelphia Bar Foundation removes barriers to justice, engages the community in support of civil legal aid, and builds system-wide capacity in order to strengthen the provision of quality legal services and to ensure that all individuals understand their rights to equal justice under law.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
GarloWard, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-bar-foundation.jpeg
Philadelphia Bar Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GarloWard, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philadelphia Bar Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GarloWard, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philadelphia Bar Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — GarloWard, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GarloWard, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philadelphia Bar Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philadelphia Bar Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
GarloWard, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philadelphia-bar-foundation.jpeg
Philadelphia Bar Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GarloWard, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philadelphia Bar Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Philadelphia Bar Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GarloWard, P.C. company.

In the current year, Philadelphia Bar Foundation company and GarloWard, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Philadelphia Bar Foundation company nor GarloWard, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Bar Foundation company nor GarloWard, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Philadelphia Bar Foundation company nor GarloWard, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. company nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. company nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GarloWard, P.C. nor Philadelphia Bar Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X