Comparison Overview

Gardner Linn

VS

Poole Huffman

Gardner Linn

2851 Charlevoix Dr., S.E., Suite 207, Grand Rapids, 49546, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Located in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP, specializes in the protection, enforcement, and defense of intellectual property including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, as well as unfair competition and related agreements. Our Grand Rapids intellectual property attorneys represent clients ranging from large, multi-national corporations to sole-proprietorships and individuals in the United States and throughout the world. Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP has been given the highest AV rating by Martindale-Hubbell the most recognized lawyers listing service in the United States. Individual attorneys in the firm have also received the highest AV rating available by Martindale-Hubbell. In addition, Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP attorneys have been recognized in the Best Lawyers in America for Intellectual Property, in the Grand Rapids Magazine as Best Lawyers in West Michigan by specialty in intellectual property practice, and in Michigan Super Lawyers in intellectual property. For the second year in a row Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP is the only firm in West Michigan ranked as a First-Tier Firm in the 2012-2013 Edition of the U.S. News-Best Lawyers listing of Best Law Firms in all of the Intellectual Property law categories: "Patent Law,"​ "Trademark Law,"​ "Copyright Law,"​ "Litigation-Patent,"​ and "Litigation-Intellectual Property."​ Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP also has the singular distinction of its attorneys being named by Best Lawyers as the individual Grand Rapids Lawyer of the Year in each of the categories "Patent Law,"​ "Trademark Law,"​ "Copyright Law"​ and "Litigation-Patent."​

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Poole Huffman

3562 Habersham at Northlake, Tucker, GA, 30084, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Poole Huffman, LLC is a business litigation and commercial collections firm. Our Philosophy Innovative Strategy: Every litigation matter is a business decision. Poole Huffman understands that you have chosen us to help guide you to a successful resolution. We shape innovative legal strategies and creative solutions to enhance business opportunities and resolve disputes. Value: We are a small firm that provides large firm quality at small firm cost. We bring our experience, knowledge, integrity and professionalism to bear for our clients in every action we take. Practice Areas Business Litigation: We bring business sense, common sense, and an understanding of the law to help businesses fix problems. Litigation is a business decision, and we keep that principle first and foremost when guiding our clients through the process. Collections: In every economy, but especially in this economy, customers are slow-paying or not paying at all. We combine a knack for investigation with knowledge of this specialized field of law to help put money back into our clients’ pockets. Real Estate: Resolving real estate disputes encompasses a large portion of our practice. Our clients – developers, lenders, landowners, contractors, property managers, loan participants, home owners’ associations and corporate tenants – trust us to navigate them through their disputes to a successful resolution. Whether that resolution takes place through direct negotiation, mediation, arbitration or trial, we have the skill set, experience and persistence necessary to achieve the maximum outcome and avoid unnecessary risks.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardner-linn-burkhart-&-flory-llp.jpeg
Gardner Linn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poole-huffman-llc.jpeg
Poole Huffman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gardner Linn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Poole Huffman
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gardner Linn in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Poole Huffman in 2025.

Incident History — Gardner Linn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gardner Linn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Poole Huffman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Poole Huffman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardner-linn-burkhart-&-flory-llp.jpeg
Gardner Linn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/poole-huffman-llc.jpeg
Poole Huffman
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gardner Linn company and Poole Huffman company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Poole Huffman company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gardner Linn company.

In the current year, Poole Huffman company and Gardner Linn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Poole Huffman company nor Gardner Linn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Poole Huffman company nor Gardner Linn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Poole Huffman company nor Gardner Linn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gardner Linn company nor Poole Huffman company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gardner Linn company nor Poole Huffman company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Poole Huffman company employs more people globally than Gardner Linn company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gardner Linn nor Poole Huffman holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X