Comparison Overview

Garden Village Port Macquarie

VS

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Garden Village Port Macquarie

7 Garden Crescent, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Garden Village is a friendly and welcoming community offering Retirement Living, Aged Care, Home Care and Disability Support. We are a registered not for profit organisation with 40 years experience caring for our community. Our purpose is to provide quality, accessible and individual care services for Greater Port Macquarie. We support a whole-of-community, whole-of-life, multiple activity approach to ageing. Our team is passionate about ensuring Garden Village is a connected and inclusive community where everyone has the opportunity to live a good life. Garden Village is located in Port Macquarie midway between Sydney and Brisbane on the beautiful Mid North Coast of NSW, only 2 hours north of Newcastle, 4 hours from Sydney and 5 hours from the Gold Coast. This striking coastal region of NSW is a diverse, expanding contemporary regional centre with university and tertiary campuses, public and private high schools, and large public and private hospital facilities. Offering stunning natural attractions with pristine beaches, lakes and rivers, rainforests, national parks and mountain regions, Port Macquarie provides an enviable work life balance and career opportunities. Garden Village is one of the premier aged care and self care service providers on the Mid North Coast and prides itself on providing high quality person centred care and support to our residents and the aged care community. We offer highly competitive salary packaging and support professional development opportunities in partnership with our tertiary providers.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Weak

Between 300 and 400

Since its start in 1855 as the nation's first hospital devoted exclusively to caring for children, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia has been the birthplace for many dramatic firsts in pediatric medicine. The Hospital has fostered medical discoveries and innovations that have improved pediatric healthcare and saved countless childrenโ€™s lives. Today, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is one of the leading pediatric hospitals and research facilities in the world. Our 150 years of innovation and service to our patients, their families and our community reflect an ongoing commitment to exceptional patient care, training new generations of pediatric healthcare providers and pioneering significant research initiatives.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,575
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garden-village-port-macquarie.jpeg
Garden Village Port Macquarie
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Garden Village Port Macquarie
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Garden Village Port Macquarie in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Garden Village Port Macquarie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garden Village Port Macquarie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/garden-village-port-macquarie.jpeg
Garden Village Port Macquarie
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Garden Village Port Macquarie company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Garden Village Port Macquarie company.

In the current year, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company and Garden Village Port Macquarie company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company nor Garden Village Port Macquarie company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company nor Garden Village Port Macquarie company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company nor Garden Village Port Macquarie company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Garden Village Port Macquarie company nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Garden Village Port Macquarie company nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company employs more people globally than Garden Village Port Macquarie company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X