Comparison Overview

Old Navy

VS

Sainsbury's

Old Navy

2 Folsom Street, San Francisco, 94158, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.gapinc.com/old-navy-home

Forget what you know about old-school industry rules. When you work at Old Navy, you’re choosing a different path. From day one, we’ve been on a mission to democratize fashion and make shopping fun again. Our teams make style accessible to everyone, creating high-quality, must-have fashion essentials for the whole family, with love, season after season. We opened our first store in 1994 in San Francisco and have been on a roll ever since. Today, customers can find fabulous fashion at affordable prices online and in one of our 1,000+ stores globally. Old Navy celebrates a workplace that’s just as diverse as our customers. Fun, fashion, family and value are at the heart of everything we do. We cultivate a community of playful personalities that thrive in a fast-paced environment where our employees can be their most authentic selves. Here, we’re family. Old Navy – a brand for everyone, a place for you!

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 29,072
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Sainsbury's

33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://sainsburys.jobs/

Over 150 years old and still going strong, we’re the UK’s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know they’ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands, from Argos, Nectar and Habitat to Sainsbury’s Bank, Smart Charge and Tu. What’s next for Sainsbury’s? We've put food back at the heart of our business and we’re taking Sainsbury’s to the next level. We’re investing in technology and people and we’re thinking bigger about how we attract and connect with our customers, while doing everything we can to create a more resilient UK food system.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 69,917
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc.-old-navy.jpeg
Old Navy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Old Navy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sainsbury's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Navy in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sainsbury's in 2026.

Incident History — Old Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sainsbury's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sainsbury's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc.-old-navy.jpeg
Old Navy
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2010
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sainsburys.jpeg
Sainsbury's
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party Vendor Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2010
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unencrypted Emails
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Old Navy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sainsbury's company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sainsbury's company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Old Navy company.

In the current year, Sainsbury's company and Old Navy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sainsbury's company nor Old Navy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Sainsbury's company and Old Navy company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Sainsbury's company nor Old Navy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Old Navy company nor Sainsbury's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sainsbury's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Old Navy company.

Sainsbury's company employs more people globally than Old Navy company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Old Navy nor Sainsbury's holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References