Comparison Overview

Gap Inc.

VS

Amazon Business

Gap Inc.

2 Folsom, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94105
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Gap Inc., a house of iconic brands, is the largest specialty apparel company in America. Its Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic, and Athleta brands offer clothing, accessories, and lifestyle products for men, women and children. Since 1969, Gap Inc. has created products and experiences that shape culture, while doing right by employees, communities and the planet. Gap Inc. products are available worldwide through company-operated stores, franchise stores, and e-commerce sites. Fiscal year 2023 net sales were $14.9 billion. For more information, please visit www.gapinc.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 68,676
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Amazon Business

Seattle, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Think there’s a better way to buy for business? So do we. That’s why Amazon Business is changing the world of procurement. We simplify the purchasing process to make it easier for our customers to get the products they need. We solve for our customers’ unmet and undiscovered needs — continuously expanding our selection and adding relevant new tools and features. We’re right for any organization at any stage — starting, growing, transforming. And it’s our instinct to invent — we purposefully question what others don’t, creating unexpectedly better ways of getting things done. This is the official global LinkedIn page for Amazon Business. Follow us for updates.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 13,959
Subsidiaries: 89
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc-.jpeg
Gap Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazon-business.jpeg
Amazon Business
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gap Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amazon Business
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gap Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amazon Business in 2025.

Incident History — Gap Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gap Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amazon Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gap-inc-.jpeg
Gap Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2010
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazon-business.jpeg
Amazon Business
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exposed Docker API, Misconfigured AWS EC2 Instances, Python Docker SDK
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption, Cybercrime-as-a-Service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Backend Update Bug
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gap Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Amazon Business company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Amazon Business company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Gap Inc. company.

In the current year, Amazon Business company has reported more cyber incidents than Gap Inc. company.

Amazon Business company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gap Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Amazon Business company and Gap Inc. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Amazon Business company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gap Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Amazon Business company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Gap Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Amazon Business company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gap Inc. company.

Gap Inc. company employs more people globally than Amazon Business company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gap Inc. nor Amazon Business holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H