Comparison Overview

Gamers for Good

VS

FlipGive

Gamers for Good

Austin, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 800 and 849

Gamers for Good (G4G) came together as part of a response to gamers wanting to unite and be of service when needed. Game Developers Peet and Liz Cooper ,G4G founders,thought in a time where so much negativity can be attached to the game industry thought that providing a way to give back and hopefully shed some positive light in the name of the game development community was a good thing for everyone.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FlipGive

325 Front St West, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Y1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The cashback app where everyone wins. Teams raise funds without fundraising and brands earn new shopper loyalty by giving back where it matters. FlipGive Rewards, a white-label embedded merchant Rewards platform, expands the impact of FlipGive’s shopping-as-cashback fundraising model by giving companies an easy way to turn everyday shopping into cashback donations that give back to their users. Launched in 2016, FlipGive is a Certified B Corporation and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamers-for-good.jpeg
Gamers for Good
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flipgive.jpeg
FlipGive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gamers for Good
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FlipGive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gamers for Good in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FlipGive in 2025.

Incident History — Gamers for Good (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gamers for Good cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FlipGive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FlipGive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gamers-for-good.jpeg
Gamers for Good
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flipgive.jpeg
FlipGive
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gamers for Good company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FlipGive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FlipGive company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gamers for Good company.

In the current year, FlipGive company and Gamers for Good company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FlipGive company nor Gamers for Good company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FlipGive company nor Gamers for Good company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FlipGive company nor Gamers for Good company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gamers for Good company nor FlipGive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gamers for Good company nor FlipGive company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FlipGive company employs more people globally than Gamers for Good company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gamers for Good nor FlipGive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N