Comparison Overview

GAME Engineering Ltd

VS

United Rolling Mill Technology

GAME Engineering Ltd

Camp Road, Lincoln, Witham St Hughs, LN6 9TW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Game Engineering is regarded as one of the leading materials processing and handling engineers, specialising in the Biomass, Renewable and Alternative Fuels sector, working with some of the key players in the power industry. The company also has a Custodial Division and is the market leader in providing security doors, gates, windows, grilles and custom products to the Prison Service. Based at Witham St Hugh’s, the company celebrated 30 years at the very top of their game in 2016.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

United Rolling Mill Technology

undefined, undefined, undefined, 15236, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

United Rolling Mill Technology, LLC (URT) is an engineering firm based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA. We engineer the design and supply of equipment for rolling mills on a world wide global basis. URT has many strong partners world wide that have excellent manufacturing experience and capabilities for our products that give URT an incredible price advantage (e.g. 30% lower than current US market). We are able to supply complete turnkey projects, EAF, Slab/Billet/Bloom Casters, I-Beam/H-Beam Mills, Hot/Cold Rolling Mills, Process Lines, etc. Please visit our website, www.urt-us.com, to see a complete list of our engineering capabilities or contact by phone (412-882-9287) or email ([email protected]).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/game-engineering-ltd.jpeg
GAME Engineering Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rolling-mill-technology.jpeg
United Rolling Mill Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GAME Engineering Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United Rolling Mill Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GAME Engineering Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Rolling Mill Technology in 2025.

Incident History — GAME Engineering Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GAME Engineering Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United Rolling Mill Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Rolling Mill Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/game-engineering-ltd.jpeg
GAME Engineering Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-rolling-mill-technology.jpeg
United Rolling Mill Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GAME Engineering Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to United Rolling Mill Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, United Rolling Mill Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GAME Engineering Ltd company.

In the current year, United Rolling Mill Technology company and GAME Engineering Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither United Rolling Mill Technology company nor GAME Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither United Rolling Mill Technology company nor GAME Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither United Rolling Mill Technology company nor GAME Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd company nor United Rolling Mill Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd company nor United Rolling Mill Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GAME Engineering Ltd company employs more people globally than United Rolling Mill Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GAME Engineering Ltd nor United Rolling Mill Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H