Comparison Overview

Gallery Aferro

VS

Mobile Museums of Tolerance

Gallery Aferro

73 Market Street, Newark, NJ, 07102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://aferro.org

The mission of Gallery Aferro is to bring cultural education and aesthetic engagement with contemporary issues to all people equally, and to create an environment where artists can gather and share physical and intellectual resources. We are working towards an arts community that is available to everyone, without sacrificing standards or quality of experience.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mobile Museums of Tolerance

1399 s Roxbury Dr, Los Angeles, 90035, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mmot.com

The Mobile Museums of Tolerance (MMOT) is a free traveling human rights education center utilizing innovative technology and interactive lessons to bring a message of tolerance directly to communities throughout the United States. The MMOT empowers visitors to combat anti-Semitism, bullying, racism, hate, and intolerance and to promote human dignity. The Mobile museums are based on its namesake, the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles (MOTLA) Through education, empathy, and tolerance programming, the MOTLA challenges visitors to confront bigotry, antisemitism and hate and to understand the Holocaust in both historical and contemporary contexts. The MMOT’s 32-seat wheelchair-accessible vehicle serves as a self-contained classroom while also delivering a field trip experience to its visitors. Led by a licensed educator, the MMOT uses immersive technology and facilitated dialogue to deliver its workshops. These carefully designed workshops cover difficult topics such as propaganda, discrimination, hate, and dehumanization in an age-appropriate manner. MMOT workshops teach visitors the dangers of the past in order to create a better future focused on tolerance, kindness, and empathy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallery-aferro.jpeg
Gallery Aferro
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mobile-museums-of-tolerance.jpeg
Mobile Museums of Tolerance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gallery Aferro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mobile Museums of Tolerance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallery Aferro in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mobile Museums of Tolerance in 2026.

Incident History — Gallery Aferro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallery Aferro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mobile Museums of Tolerance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mobile Museums of Tolerance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallery-aferro.jpeg
Gallery Aferro
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mobile-museums-of-tolerance.jpeg
Mobile Museums of Tolerance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gallery Aferro company and Mobile Museums of Tolerance company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mobile Museums of Tolerance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gallery Aferro company.

In the current year, Mobile Museums of Tolerance company and Gallery Aferro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mobile Museums of Tolerance company nor Gallery Aferro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mobile Museums of Tolerance company nor Gallery Aferro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mobile Museums of Tolerance company nor Gallery Aferro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gallery Aferro company nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gallery Aferro company nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gallery Aferro nor Mobile Museums of Tolerance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References