Comparison Overview

Gallagher Insurance New Zealand

VS

Blue Bridges Insurance

Gallagher Insurance New Zealand

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ajg.co.nz

We’ve changed our name. Gallagher (formerly Crombie Lockwood) has been arranging insurance cover for New Zealanders since 1978. With over 30 offices around the country, our brokers combine local and industry knowledge with insurance expertise, to keep our clients protected when things go wrong. Gallagher has been our parent company since 2014 and we are proud to be part of one of the world’s largest insurance brokerage, consulting and risk management firms. In New Zealand we arrange business, rural, personal and life and health insurance on behalf of around 115,000 clients. We are active in caring for our communities and back initiatives that enhance, protect and restore our environment and the things that matter to Kiwis. We are an official partner of Save the Kiwi, a national charity supporting kiwi conservation projects and Principal Partner of Trees for Survival, an environmental educational programme run in schools.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 359
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Blue Bridges Insurance

Louisville, 40206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bluebridgesinsurance.com

Blue Bridges Insurance is a concierge insurance agency focusing on the unique needs of each and every person. Our mission is twofold. We work with business owners to help attract/retain high-quality employees, maintain competitiveness in the marketplace, and improve employee morale by building/strengthening a comprehensive benefits portfolio. We also partner directly with individuals to to review current benefits, identify any gaps, and align proper coverage with their specific needs.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagherinsurancenz.jpeg
Gallagher Insurance New Zealand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluebridgesinsurance.jpeg
Blue Bridges Insurance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gallagher Insurance New Zealand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Bridges Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher Insurance New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Bridges Insurance in 2026.

Incident History — Gallagher Insurance New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher Insurance New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Bridges Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Bridges Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gallagherinsurancenz.jpeg
Gallagher Insurance New Zealand
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bluebridgesinsurance.jpeg
Blue Bridges Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blue Bridges Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blue Bridges Insurance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company.

In the current year, Blue Bridges Insurance company and Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blue Bridges Insurance company nor Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blue Bridges Insurance company nor Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blue Bridges Insurance company nor Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company nor Blue Bridges Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company nor Blue Bridges Insurance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gallagher Insurance New Zealand company employs more people globally than Blue Bridges Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gallagher Insurance New Zealand nor Blue Bridges Insurance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References