Comparison Overview

Gala S.p.A.

VS

Halliburton

Gala S.p.A.

Via Savoia 43, 47, Roma, 00198, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

GALA is a private group, leading within the energy sector, with Italian roots and strongly oriented to internationalization Following the market liberalization, GALA’s main objectives are the sale of electricity and gas, energy production from renewable sources and energy efficiency improvement. GALA is currently one of the Italian top players in the electricity sector within power supply to public administration and it provided about 6 TWh of electricity to end customers in 2012. GALA offers its final customers: Power and gas Tailor made services aimed at improving energy efficiency Designing and realization of turnkey plants for power production from renewable sources. OUR SERVICES As being actively operating on the major European power and gas markets, and the experience of our skilled resources on the activity of supply, GALA is able to offer its customers the best economic conditions for power and gas supply through a great sense of reliability and professionalism. We pay the utmost attention to all the needs of our customers by providing reliability, fairness and transparency in the provision of both commercial and technical services and dedicated support.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Halliburton

3000 N. Sam Houston Pkwy E., Houston, Texas, US, 77032
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

We collaborate and engineer solutions to maximize asset value for our customers. Founded in 1919, Halliburton is one of the world's largest providers of products and services to the energy industry. With more than 45,000 employees, representing 130 nationalities in more than 80 countries, the company helps its customers maximize value throughout the lifecycle of the reservoir – from locating hydrocarbons and managing geological data, to drilling and formation evaluation, well construction and completion, and optimizing production throughout the life of the asset.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 58,792
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gala-spa.jpeg
Gala S.p.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliburton.jpeg
Halliburton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gala S.p.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Halliburton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gala S.p.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Halliburton in 2025.

Incident History — Gala S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gala S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Halliburton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Halliburton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gala-spa.jpeg
Gala S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halliburton.jpeg
Halliburton
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gala S.p.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Halliburton company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Halliburton company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gala S.p.A. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Halliburton company and Gala S.p.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Halliburton company nor Gala S.p.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Halliburton company nor Gala S.p.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Halliburton company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Gala S.p.A. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Gala S.p.A. company nor Halliburton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Halliburton company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gala S.p.A. company.

Halliburton company employs more people globally than Gala S.p.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor Halliburton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N