Comparison Overview

Gala S.p.A.

VS

aramco

Gala S.p.A.

Via Savoia 43, 47, Roma, 00198, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

GALA is a private group, leading within the energy sector, with Italian roots and strongly oriented to internationalization Following the market liberalization, GALA’s main objectives are the sale of electricity and gas, energy production from renewable sources and energy efficiency improvement. GALA is currently one of the Italian top players in the electricity sector within power supply to public administration and it provided about 6 TWh of electricity to end customers in 2012. GALA offers its final customers: Power and gas Tailor made services aimed at improving energy efficiency Designing and realization of turnkey plants for power production from renewable sources. OUR SERVICES As being actively operating on the major European power and gas markets, and the experience of our skilled resources on the activity of supply, GALA is able to offer its customers the best economic conditions for power and gas supply through a great sense of reliability and professionalism. We pay the utmost attention to all the needs of our customers by providing reliability, fairness and transparency in the provision of both commercial and technical services and dedicated support.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, SA, 31311
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 161,219
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gala-spa.jpeg
Gala S.p.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gala S.p.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
aramco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gala S.p.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2025.

Incident History — Gala S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gala S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gala-spa.jpeg
Gala S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

aramco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gala S.p.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

aramco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gala S.p.A. company has not reported any.

In the current year, aramco company and Gala S.p.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

aramco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Gala S.p.A. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither aramco company nor Gala S.p.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither aramco company nor Gala S.p.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gala S.p.A. company nor aramco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gala S.p.A. company nor aramco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

aramco company employs more people globally than Gala S.p.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gala S.p.A. nor aramco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N