G5 Enterprises Commercial Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (G5E1767418642)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the G5 Enterprises Commercial breach identified under incident ID G5E1767418642.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of G5 Enterprises Commercial's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/g5enterprises, the number of followers: 118, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 22 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 693 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on G5 Enterprises Commercial and their customers.

On 28 March 2025, G5 Enterprises, LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "G5 Enterprises, LLC Data Breach Investigation".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Certain systems on the company’s network, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Immediate steps to address and investigate the event.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Place a fraud alert or credit freeze on credit files by contacting the credit reporting agencies, Monitor financial accounts and health insurance statements for unusual or suspicious activity and Request a free copy of credit reports from each of the three nationwide credit bureaus at least once a year, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Individuals notified to be vigilant against identity theft and fraud.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access to sensitive customer data, and network disruption detected and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party forensic specialists investigating the event. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating high-risk identity theft and payment information exposure and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to network systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, drivers license, medical/health insurance info exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating financial account data and payment card details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive PII exposed; data exfiltration implied and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party forensic investigation suggests external transfer. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating network disruption detected and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware strain identified but disruption noted. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.