Comparison Overview

G3 Communications

VS

National Geographic

G3 Communications

777 Terrace Ave, Hasbrouck Heights, 07604, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gthreecom.com/

Founded in 2007, G3 Communications is a digital media firm specializing in B2B marketing. With an expertise in publishing content across traditional and emerging channels, G3's brands include Demand Gen Report, ABM In Action, Retail TouchPoints, Channel Marketer Report and Content4Demand. G3 Communications also produces a number of annual live events, including: The B2B Marketing Exchange, The Retail Innovation Conference and Retail TouchPoints Live @ RetailX. An end-to-end marketing firm, G3 Communications helps B2B organizations develop revenue-producing through comprehensive campaigns by providing content ideation, creation and distribution services. Its growing clientele includes Oracle, Marketo, SAS, FIS, Citrix, NCR, HubSpot, Salesforce and a number of other B2B solution providers large and small.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Geographic

1145 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036-4688, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nationalgeographic.com

Since its inception more than 135 years ago, the core purpose of National Geographic has been to further the knowledge and awareness of our world. We are the world’s leading multimedia destination for the best stories in science, exploration and adventure. And our unrivaled sense of purpose and mission is best evidenced by the fact that nearly 30% of our profits go to funding real scientists, explorers, and conservationists. Official LinkedIn of National Geographic

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8,465
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g3-communications.jpeg
G3 Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
G3 Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Geographic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G3 Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Geographic in 2025.

Incident History — G3 Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G3 Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Geographic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Geographic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g3-communications.jpeg
G3 Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Geographic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to G3 Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Geographic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to G3 Communications company.

In the current year, National Geographic company and G3 Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Geographic company nor G3 Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor G3 Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor G3 Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither G3 Communications company nor National Geographic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Geographic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to G3 Communications company.

National Geographic company employs more people globally than G3 Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither G3 Communications nor National Geographic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References