Comparison Overview

G2 Technologies, Inc.

VS

Failsafe Controls

G2 Technologies, Inc.

2700 Gateway Centre Blvd, Morrisville, North Carolina, 27560, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At G2 Technologies we believe that by empowering our clients with automation and test solutions supported by rich data analytics, flexible architecture and industry standard components, they will succeed beyond a simple ROI analysis. We ask questions, listen, understand, and then collaborate to design and deliver a solution. Our integrated team of mechanical and electrical engineers, programmers, fabricators, and support staff – all located in the heart of North Carolina’s Research Triangle Park area - have delivered more than 300 systems since 2003. We specialize in the design and development of automated inspection, measurement, and test systems for aerospace, automotive and B2B industrial clients. As an experienced integrator, we use the latest technology to provide cost-effective, turn-key solutions for clients around the world. From aircraft smoke detectors to precision defect detection in automotive parts, we have the experience, tools, and resources to deliver a solution for the most demanding applications. #automation #dataacquisition #engineering #manufacturing #machinevision

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Failsafe Controls

2712 Southwest Drive, New Iberia, Louisiana, 70560, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

When you think process automation, think Failsafe. With substantial experience and a knack for finding solutions, Failsafe Controls has become a leader in managing products and services for the oil and gas industry. We’ve successfully executed projects across the globe, and we’ve made a name for ourselves along the way. We are committed to providing you with the best selection of products available and the dependable partnership that you deserve. Our customer service is unmatched. Our methods are Failsafe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g2-technologies-inc.jpeg
G2 Technologies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/failsafe-controls.jpeg
Failsafe Controls
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
G2 Technologies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Failsafe Controls
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G2 Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Failsafe Controls in 2025.

Incident History — G2 Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G2 Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Failsafe Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Failsafe Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g2-technologies-inc.jpeg
G2 Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/failsafe-controls.jpeg
Failsafe Controls
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both G2 Technologies, Inc. company and Failsafe Controls company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Failsafe Controls company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to G2 Technologies, Inc. company.

In the current year, Failsafe Controls company and G2 Technologies, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Failsafe Controls company nor G2 Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Failsafe Controls company nor G2 Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Failsafe Controls company nor G2 Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. company nor Failsafe Controls company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. company nor Failsafe Controls company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Failsafe Controls company employs more people globally than G2 Technologies, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds HIPAA certification.

Neither G2 Technologies, Inc. nor Failsafe Controls holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H