Comparison Overview

G&F Associates

VS

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing

G&F Associates

1912 Mountain View Rd, None, Vinton, Virginia, US, 24179
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

G&F Associates was founded in 1988 by Bruce Ashby, who is the current owner. Bruce stated working in distributor sales in 1978, where he remained until 1986. After a short stint in with a manufacturer of power transmission equipment, Bruce started G&F Associates. His very first principal was Winsmith, and we are all proud to say that they are still on our line card today! While we are celebrating our 32nd year of business, there have been many changes, but our core relationships are still intact. Our staff is highly knowledgeable and experienced in the application of power transmission, motion control, and material handling products. Coverage provided in VA,WV,NC & SC

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing

2925 Old Steele Creek Road, Charlotte, NC, 28208, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing Inc. is a full service industrial distributor, specializing in industrial belting of all types. Headquartered in Charlotte, NC, with a branch in LaGrange, GA, we are perfectly situated to serve customers throughout the Southeast. From our beginning as a manufacturer of textile aprons, to today's broad industrial emphasis, we lead the field in customer service. Bowman Hollis partners with the best belting manufacturers from around the world, so that we can provide exactly the right belt to keep your machinery running. We offer the same service on hose and pneumatic products of all types. Our company is family owned, and has been for over 60 years. All of our employees and customers are part of our extended family, and you are welcome to join us.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g&f-associates.jpeg
G&F Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowman-hollis-manufacturing.jpeg
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
G&F Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G&F Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bowman Hollis Manufacturing in 2025.

Incident History — G&F Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G&F Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bowman Hollis Manufacturing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g&f-associates.jpeg
G&F Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bowman-hollis-manufacturing.jpeg
Bowman Hollis Manufacturing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to G&F Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to G&F Associates company.

In the current year, Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company and G&F Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company nor G&F Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company nor G&F Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company nor G&F Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither G&F Associates company nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither G&F Associates company nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bowman Hollis Manufacturing company employs more people globally than G&F Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither G&F Associates nor Bowman Hollis Manufacturing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H