Comparison Overview

FWD Insurance

VS

Marsh McLennan Agency

FWD Insurance

13/F, City Plaza 3, 14 Taikoo Wan Road, Quarry Bay, _, HK
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

FWD Group (1828.HK) is a pan-Asian life and health insurance business that serves approximately 34 million customers across 10 markets, including BRI Life in Indonesia. FWD’s customer-led and tech-enabled approach aims to deliver innovative propositions, easy-to-understand products and a simpler insurance experience. Established in 2013, the company operates in some of the fastest-growing insurance markets in the world with a vision of changing the way people feel about insurance. FWD Group is listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange under the stock code 1828.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,823
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marsh McLennan Agency

360 Hamilton Ave, White Plains, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Marsh McLennan Agency, a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), is a leading provider of business insurance, employee health & benefits, retirement & wealth, and private client insurance solutions across the US and Canada. Marsh is a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $24 billion and more than 90,000 colleagues, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. For more information about Marsh McLennan Agency, visit marshmma.com.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,372
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FWD Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marsh McLennan Agency
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FWD Insurance in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan Agency in 2026.

Incident History — FWD Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FWD Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marsh McLennan Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marsh-mclennan-agency.jpeg
Marsh McLennan Agency
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FWD Insurance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marsh McLennan Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FWD Insurance company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marsh McLennan Agency company and FWD Insurance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Marsh McLennan Agency company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FWD Insurance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan Agency company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FWD Insurance company nor Marsh McLennan Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marsh McLennan Agency company employs more people globally than FWD Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor Marsh McLennan Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H