Comparison Overview

FWD Insurance

VS

HUB International

FWD Insurance

13/F, City Plaza 3, 14 Taikoo Wan Road, Quarry Bay, _, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

FWD Group (1828.HK) is a pan-Asian life and health insurance business that serves approximately 34 million customers across 10 markets, including BRI Life in Indonesia. FWD’s customer-led and tech-enabled approach aims to deliver innovative propositions, easy-to-understand products and a simpler insurance experience. Established in 2013, the company operates in some of the fastest-growing insurance markets in the world with a vision of changing the way people feel about insurance. FWD Group is listed on the main board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange under the stock code 1828.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,743
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HUB International

300 North LaSalle, 17th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60654
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Hi, we’re HUB. We advise businesses and individuals on how to reach their goals. When you partner with us, you’re at the center of a vast network of risk, insurance, employee benefits, retirement and wealth management specialists that bring clarity to a changing world with tailored solutions and unrelenting advocacy. So you’re ready for tomorrow. About Hub International Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Hub International Limited (Hub) is a leading full-service global insurance broker providing property and casualty, life and health, employee benefits, investment and risk management products and services. From offices located throughout North America, Hub’s vast network of specialists provides peace of mind on what matters most by protecting clients through unrelenting advocacy and tailored insurance solutions. For more information, please visit hubinternational.com.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 15,998
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hub-international.jpeg
HUB International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FWD Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HUB International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FWD Insurance in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUB International in 2025.

Incident History — FWD Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FWD Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HUB International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUB International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fwd-insurance.jpeg
FWD Insurance
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hub-international.jpeg
HUB International
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FWD Insurance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HUB International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HUB International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FWD Insurance company has not reported any.

In the current year, HUB International company and FWD Insurance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HUB International company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

HUB International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FWD Insurance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HUB International company nor FWD Insurance company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance company nor HUB International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HUB International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FWD Insurance company.

HUB International company employs more people globally than FWD Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FWD Insurance nor HUB International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.