Comparison Overview

FVF LAW

VS

Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C

FVF LAW

3101 Bee Cave Rd, Austin, Texas, 78746, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

People First. Attorneys Second. FVF Law is a personal injury law firm that believes it matters why we practice law: to make sure good people in unfair circumstances who want reasonable options are taken seriously, especially by their attorney. We value transparency, compassion, and justice, and we strive to embody that in our practice. At FVF Law, you can trust that you’ve got the best people on your case, for the right reasons.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C

1240 S. Pioneer Way, Moses Lake, WA, 98837, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The law firm limits it practice to representing the injured and disabled, primarily in the area of workers compensation and social security disability, and we have a substantial practice in the area of personal injury, as well as product liability claims. Established in 1954, with a principal office now in Moses Lake, we operate offices in Richland/Tri-Cities, East Wenatchee, Yakima, Walla Walla, Mount Vernon, Brewster and Ellensburg. We are proud to have the opportunity to protect the rights and futures of our injured neighbors, protecting their rights every step of the way and helping them to rebuild their lives.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fvflaw.jpeg
FVF LAW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calbom-and-schwab-p-s-c.jpeg
Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FVF LAW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FVF LAW in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C in 2025.

Incident History — FVF LAW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FVF LAW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fvflaw.jpeg
FVF LAW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/calbom-and-schwab-p-s-c.jpeg
Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FVF LAW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FVF LAW company.

In the current year, Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company and FVF LAW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company nor FVF LAW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company nor FVF LAW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company nor FVF LAW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FVF LAW company nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FVF LAW company nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C company employs more people globally than FVF LAW company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FVF LAW nor Calbom and Schwab, P.S.C holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X