Comparison Overview

Fusion Signs & Graphics

VS

Rocconic Corp.

Fusion Signs & Graphics

Units 1 - 2 Hillgate Business Centre Swallow Street, Manchester, SK1 3AU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03

With a combined experience of over 70 years in the sign industry Fusion Signs prides itself on providing a full range of products and services from Design to Manufacture to Installation, this ensures rapid turnaround whilst retaining full control over the quality of workmanship and delivering exceptional value for money.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rocconic Corp.

50 Halstead Blvd., Zelienople, PA, 16063, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Signage is a key component of any business or industry. The image your company presents to the world is as important as the products you sell. At Sign Innovation this aspect of business is our business and thus we work closely with our clients to develop solutions that fit their needs and budget. As a full service production facility we can handle the entire scope of any project, from Design and Manufacturing to Installation and Service.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fusion Signs & Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signinnovation.jpeg
Rocconic Corp.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fusion Signs & Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rocconic Corp.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fusion Signs & Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rocconic Corp. in 2025.

Incident History — Fusion Signs & Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fusion Signs & Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rocconic Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rocconic Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fusion Signs & Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signinnovation.jpeg
Rocconic Corp.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fusion Signs & Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rocconic Corp. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rocconic Corp. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fusion Signs & Graphics company.

In the current year, Rocconic Corp. company and Fusion Signs & Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rocconic Corp. company nor Fusion Signs & Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rocconic Corp. company nor Fusion Signs & Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rocconic Corp. company nor Fusion Signs & Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics company nor Rocconic Corp. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics company nor Rocconic Corp. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rocconic Corp. company employs more people globally than Fusion Signs & Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fusion Signs & Graphics nor Rocconic Corp. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X