Comparison Overview

Furnival Chambers

VS

Joseph Law Group

Furnival Chambers

30-32 Furnival Street London, England EC4A 1JQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Chambers of Oliver Blunt QC and Sally O’Neill QC. Furnival Chambers is a multidisciplinary set, with members consistently ranked as leaders in their fields. We specialise in serious crime, financial crime, extradition, regulation & compliance. In addition to the above practice areas, there are members who specialise in government work and sports law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joseph Law Group

3690 Orange Pl, Suite 175, Beachwood, Ohio, US, 44122
Last Update: 2025-11-28

While many lawyers handle injury claims, our attorneys at the Joseph Law Group are seasoned in every area of personal injury law including motor vehicle accidents, serious and catastrophic injuries, wrongful death, dog bites, premise liability, medical malpractice, and more. Our established track record in helping over 5,000 injured victims retain monetary compensation for their injuries has proven us to be credible and effective in what we do. Located in heart of Northeast Ohio, Joseph Law Group has over 50 years of combined professional experience in personal injury law. We’re known for being fair and reasonable yet aggressive when it comes to getting our clients the justice that they deserve due to someone else’s negligence. Representing someone’s interest is a very serious obligation, and the attorneys along with the staff at Joseph Law Group are trained to be committed to that obligation for every claim that we handle. At the Joseph Law Group, we take personal injury claims… personally!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/furnival-chambers.jpeg
Furnival Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-law-group.jpeg
Joseph Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Furnival Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joseph Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Furnival Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joseph Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Furnival Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Furnival Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joseph Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joseph Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/furnival-chambers.jpeg
Furnival Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joseph-law-group.jpeg
Joseph Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Furnival Chambers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joseph Law Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joseph Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Furnival Chambers company.

In the current year, Joseph Law Group company and Furnival Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joseph Law Group company nor Furnival Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joseph Law Group company nor Furnival Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joseph Law Group company nor Furnival Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Furnival Chambers company nor Joseph Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Furnival Chambers company nor Joseph Law Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Furnival Chambers nor Joseph Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X