Comparison Overview

Fuller Hospital

VS

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Fuller Hospital

200 May St, None, Attleboro, Massachusetts, US, 02703
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Fuller Hospital is a 102-bed licensed, private psychiatric facility located in South Attleboro, Massachusetts providing inpatient and outpatient behavioral health services to residents of Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Inpatient units are designed to treat adults with general psychiatric or intellectual disabilities, as well as adolescents with general psychiatric issues. Patients with co-occurring psychiatric and substance abuse disorders can be treated on most units. Fuller Hospital also provides a less intensive Partial Hospitalization Program (PHP) to patients with psychiatric and co-occurring psychiatric and substance abuse disorders. Programs Include: Inpatient Treatment for Adolescents and Adults Partial Hospitalization for Adults Intellectual Disabilities Inpatient Treatment for Adults Partial Plus: short-term housing for men and women concurrent with PHP Community Services Program for Children and Adolescents Fuller Hospital is accredited by The Joint Commission and licensed by the Department of Mental Health (DMH) and Department of Public Health (DPH) Bureau of Substance Abuse Services. Our dedicated staff of psychiatrists, nurses, case managers and mental health technicians is committed to providing high quality patient care within a safe, clinically appropriate, welcoming environment. Contact 1-833-3FULLER or please contact our Intake Department at 508-761-8500 for admissions options.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, Greater London, BR3 3BX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-16
Between 750 and 799

* Provider of mental health and substance misuse services in South London. * A cross between a large local mental health trust and a teaching hospital, linked to a major international research institute * Provider of the most extensive portfolio of mental health services in the United Kingdom * A world leader in research, working in partnership with the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London * The largest mental health training institution in the country.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3,634
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fuller-hospital.jpeg
Fuller Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-london-and-maudsley-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fuller Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fuller Hospital in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in 2026.

Incident History — Fuller Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fuller Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fuller-hospital.jpeg
Fuller Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-london-and-maudsley-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fuller Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fuller Hospital company.

In the current year, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company and Fuller Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company nor Fuller Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company nor Fuller Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company nor Fuller Hospital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fuller Hospital company nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fuller Hospital company nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust company employs more people globally than Fuller Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fuller Hospital nor South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H