Comparison Overview

Full Color, Inc.

VS

McKinley Photography

Full Color, Inc.

7950 Carr St, None, Dallas, Texas, US, 75227
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://fullcolor.com

Full Color Inc. is a professional photo lab providing the highest level of personal service to professional photographers looking for innovative products at competitive prices. We provide services to photographers and artists within the United States. Our professional print services meet the highest quality in the industry, including utilizing professional photo paper and technology to achieve superior photo processing, as well as state-of-the-art press printing and sublimation. Whether you are searching for products like photo prints, metallic prints, metal prints, standUP® metals, gallery wraps, and fine art printing, sports products, photo greeting cards, mounting and finishing, or even press products like folded greeting cards, soft cover books, calendars, and gift tags, you will be partnering will a full-service photo lab that can exceed your expectations and provide a customizable array of products.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

McKinley Photography

4179 Oak Avenue, Clearlake, CA, 95422, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799
http://mckinleyphotography.org

Specialty Photography services in Newborn, Wedding and Family. We also do custom photo editing and restorations. We have been open for six years giving people custom photography sessions built around their needs. We have a highly educated and dedicated staff of 1 chief photographer/designer, assistant photographer, face-painter and 3 character actors.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/full-color-inc-.jpeg
Full Color, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckinley-photography.jpeg
McKinley Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Full Color, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McKinley Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Full Color, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKinley Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Full Color, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Full Color, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McKinley Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinley Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/full-color-inc-.jpeg
Full Color, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mckinley-photography.jpeg
McKinley Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McKinley Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Full Color, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Full Color, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas McKinley Photography company has not reported any.

In the current year, McKinley Photography company and Full Color, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McKinley Photography company nor Full Color, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Full Color, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other McKinley Photography company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither McKinley Photography company nor Full Color, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Full Color, Inc. company nor McKinley Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Full Color, Inc. company nor McKinley Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Full Color, Inc. company employs more people globally than McKinley Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Full Color, Inc. nor McKinley Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References