Comparison Overview

FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division

VS

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS)

FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division

850 Central Avenue, Hanover Park, IL, 60133, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

FUJIFILM North America Corporation, a marketing subsidiary of FUJIFILM Corporation, consists of five operating divisions and one subsidiary company: Imaging, Electronic Imaging, Motion Picture, Graphic Communication, Optical Devices and Fujifilm Canada. The Graphic Communication Division of FUJIFILM North America Corporation delivers solutions for workflow, consultative services, remote monitoring, color standardization and G7 implementation, pressroom products, CTP, proofing, digital printing, wide format and more. Fujifilm also manufactures and distributes Sericol inks and is a leader in the development of UV inks for the screen printing, narrow web, and large format digital printing industries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 757
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS)

885 Third Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) was acquired by WestRock Company (NYSE:WRK) in 2017 and brings its full-service print and packaging expertise to WestRock’s consumer packaging portfolio. MPS has its heritage in the spirits, healthcare, confectionery, beauty, media and consumer brands, with a proven track record of customer focus, creative ideas, technical innovation and manufacturing excellence. For company updates, please follow WestRock Company on LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/company/westrockcompany/).

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 969
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujifilm-graphic-systems.jpeg
FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multi-packaging-solutions.jpeg
Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) in 2025.

Incident History — FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujifilm-graphic-systems.jpeg
FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/multi-packaging-solutions.jpeg
Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS)
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company and Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company has not reported any.

In the current year, Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company and FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company nor FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company.

Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) company employs more people globally than FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FUJIFILM Graphic Communication Division nor Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N