Comparison Overview

Fubo

VS

Cinemark

Fubo

1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

About Fubo: FuboTV Inc. is a consumer-first live TV streaming company that is defining the future of TV. Ranked among The Americas’ Fastest-Growing Companies 2025 by the Financial Times, FuboTV owns Hulu + Live TV (entertainment), Fubo (sports) and Molotov (entertainment and sports), which stream in markets around the globe. Our Mission: Our mission is to deliver premium sports, news and entertainment programming through a best-in-class user experience that offers greater choice, flexibility and value. Central to executing our mission is the computer vision technology built out of Fubo India. Our Bangalore office is a critical tech hub for Fubo, and is leading the company's tech innovation on a global scale.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 647
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Cinemark

3900 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX, US, 75093
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Plano, TX, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. provides premium out-of-home entertainment experiences as one of the largest and most influential theatrical exhibition companies in the world with 497 theatres and 5,644 screens in the U.S. and Latin America as of September 30, 2025. • Our circuit is the third largest in the U.S. with 304 theatres and 4,249 screens in 42 states. • We ranked either #1 or #2 in box office revenues in 21 of our top 25 markets. • We are one of the most geographically diverse circuits in Latin America with 193 theatres and 1,395 screens in 13 countries. • We have a presence in 15 of the top 20 metropolitan cities in South and Central America.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 12,365
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fubotv.jpeg
Fubo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fubo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cinemark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fubo in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinemark in 2025.

Incident History — Fubo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fubo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cinemark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinemark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fubotv.jpeg
Fubo
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cinemark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fubo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fubo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cinemark company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cinemark company and Fubo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cinemark company nor Fubo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cinemark company nor Fubo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Fubo company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fubo company nor Cinemark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fubo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cinemark company.

Cinemark company employs more people globally than Fubo company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fubo nor Cinemark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Versions starting with 0.211.0 and prior to 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0 contain a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in their workflow expression evaluation system. Under certain conditions, expressions supplied by authenticated users during workflow configuration may be evaluated in an execution context that is not sufficiently isolated from the underlying runtime. An authenticated attacker could abuse this behavior to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the n8n process. Successful exploitation may lead to full compromise of the affected instance, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of workflows, and execution of system-level operations. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.120.4, 1.121.1, and 1.122.0. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to a patched version, which introduces additional safeguards to restrict expression evaluation. If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only; and/or deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation. These workarounds do not fully eliminate the risk and should only be used as short-term measures.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

FastAPI Users allows users to quickly add a registration and authentication system to their FastAPI project. Prior to version 15.0.2, the OAuth login state tokens are completely stateless and carry no per-request entropy or any data that could link them to the session that initiated the OAuth flow. `generate_state_token()` is always called with an empty `state_data` dict, so the resulting JWT only contains the fixed audience claim plus an expiration timestamp. On callback, the library merely checks that the JWT verifies under `state_secret` and is unexpired; there is no attempt to match the state value to the browser that initiated the OAuth request, no correlation cookie, and no server-side cache. Any attacker can hit `/authorize`, capture the server-generated state, finish the upstream OAuth flow with their own provider account, and then trick a victim into loading `.../callback?code=<attacker_code>&state=<attacker_state>`. Because the state JWT is valid for any client for \~1 hour, the victim’s browser will complete the flow. This leads to login CSRF. Depending on the app’s logic, the login CSRF can lead to an account takeover of the victim account or to the victim user getting logged in to the attacker's account. Version 15.0.2 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

FileZilla Client 3.63.1 contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability that allows attackers to execute malicious code by placing a crafted TextShaping.dll in the application directory. Attackers can generate a reverse shell payload using msfvenom and replace the missing DLL to achieve remote code execution when the application launches.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LDAP Tool Box Self Service Password 1.5.2 contains a password reset vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate HTTP Host headers during token generation. Attackers can craft malicious password reset requests that generate tokens sent to a controlled server, enabling potential account takeover by intercepting and using stolen reset tokens.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Kimai 1.30.10 contains a SameSite cookie vulnerability that allows attackers to steal user session cookies through malicious exploitation. Attackers can trick victims into executing a crafted PHP script that captures and writes session cookie information to a file, enabling potential session hijacking.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X