Comparison Overview

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association

VS

Stonehouse Signs

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association

TOPEKA, 66614, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

The Foil & Specialty Effects Association (FSEA) provides a wide range of resources to help companies remain profitable today and into the future. From cost-saving programs and educational opportunities to green initiatives proving the sustainability of foil decorated paper/board, the FSEA strives to provide its members with ideas, resources and solutions to grow in today’s marketplace. For more information, visit www.fsea.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stonehouse Signs

5550 W. 60th Ave, Arvada, 80001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since the 2nd year of the civil war, Stonehouse Signs has had a commitment to excellence and the willingness to take the road less traveled to guarantee customer satisfaction. Our depth of knowledge and devotion to the highest standards for visual communication products has allowed us to develop long-lasting relationships that define our business today. Providing that personal touch or custom product might be our specialty, but Stonehouse Signs is much more than that. There’s a person behind each sign, and each order. Let us guide you to the product that is exactly what you need, not just something that will work Our success is based on our relationship with you and delivering on our values. With every order, from a standard stock item to your custom request, Stonehouse delivers- lightning fast. Stonehouse Signs offers a full line of safety, traffic and facility signs and accessories, accident prevention tags, and customized dry erase boards. Visit our Industries page if you are looking for pipeline, telecommunications or ski signs, along with any other industry-specific products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsea-foil-specialty-effects-association.jpeg
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonehouse-signs.jpeg
Stonehouse Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stonehouse Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stonehouse Signs in 2025.

Incident History — FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stonehouse Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stonehouse Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsea-foil-specialty-effects-association.jpeg
FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonehouse-signs.jpeg
Stonehouse Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stonehouse Signs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stonehouse Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company.

In the current year, Stonehouse Signs company and FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stonehouse Signs company nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stonehouse Signs company nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stonehouse Signs company nor FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company nor Stonehouse Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stonehouse Signs company.

Stonehouse Signs company employs more people globally than FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FSEA - Foil & Specialty Effects Association nor Stonehouse Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N