Comparison Overview

FSB Technology

VS

Casino City

FSB Technology

Moray House, 23-31 Great Titchfield Street, London, London, W1W 7PA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

FSB Technology is one of the fastest growing, multi-award winning global sports betting and iGaming suppliers. With a significant footprint in regulated markets across Europe, Africa and North America, we work hand in hand with ambitious operators to assemble their ultimate, curated gaming experiences whilst fulfilling the needs of their markets and players. Proprietary in nature, powerful in practice, our Tier 1 tech stack of sportsbook, casino, retail and PAM is powered by a single, scalable, empowering back office platform. A recipient of the 2022 EGR Multi-Channel Supplier of the Year award at FSB Technology we're passionate about operator strategy driving our supplier technology.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 185
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Casino City

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Casino City is the flagship website of the Casino City Network, which includes an array of websites targeted to individual gaming enthusiasts and to gaming industry professionals. Online.CasinoCity.com, the world's most trusted source for objective popularity ranks of approximately 2,700 online gaming sites based on the continuous monitoring and measuring of the actual site usage of millions of online players. Online.CasinoCity.com provides multiple daily updates and a list of links to late-breaking news related to online gaming

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsb-technology.jpeg
FSB Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Casino City
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FSB Technology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Casino City
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FSB Technology in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Casino City in 2025.

Incident History — FSB Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FSB Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Casino City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Casino City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fsb-technology.jpeg
FSB Technology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Casino City
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Casino City company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FSB Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Casino City company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FSB Technology company.

In the current year, Casino City company and FSB Technology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Casino City company nor FSB Technology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Casino City company nor FSB Technology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Casino City company nor FSB Technology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FSB Technology company nor Casino City company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FSB Technology company nor Casino City company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FSB Technology company employs more people globally than Casino City company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FSB Technology nor Casino City holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H