Comparison Overview

Frontier Texas

VS

RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis

Frontier Texas

625 N 1st St, Abilene, Texas, 79601-6041, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frontiertexas.com/

Located in historic downtown Abilene, Frontier Texas is a western heritage center that brings the Old West to life with the help of state-of-the-art technology and great true stories. This award winning facility was created to serve as the anchor for the city's and region's tourism development efforts as well a key partner to the educational institutions in the region.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis

Prins Willem Alexanderhof 5, Den Haag, 2509 LK, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rkd.nl

The Netherlands Institute for Art History (RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis) administers a unique collection of documentary, library and archive material pertaining to Western art from the late Middle Ages to the present. The RKD is an essential resource for art historians and anyone else with an interest in art, whether professional or private.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-texas.jpeg
Frontier Texas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rkd.jpeg
RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Frontier Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frontier Texas in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis in 2026.

Incident History — Frontier Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frontier Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-texas.jpeg
Frontier Texas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rkd.jpeg
RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Frontier Texas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Frontier Texas company.

In the current year, RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company and Frontier Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Frontier Texas company nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Frontier Texas company nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis company employs more people globally than Frontier Texas company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References