Comparison Overview

Frontier Texas

VS

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)

Frontier Texas

625 N 1st St, Abilene, Texas, 79601-6041, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.frontiertexas.com/

Located in historic downtown Abilene, Frontier Texas is a western heritage center that brings the Old West to life with the help of state-of-the-art technology and great true stories. This award winning facility was created to serve as the anchor for the city's and region's tourism development efforts as well a key partner to the educational institutions in the region.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)

1825 Rue Semple, Quebec, G1N 4B7, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.ccq.gouv.qc.ca/

Depuis 1979, le Centre de conservation du Québec a pour mission de contribuer à la restauration et à la conservation préventive du patrimoine du Québec. Relevant du ministère de la Culture et des Communications du Québec (MCCQ), le Centre regroupe la plus importante équipe de spécialistes de la conservation et de la restauration du patrimoine au Québec. Le soutien financier du MCCQ permet le regroupement d'une équipe pluridisciplinaire de spécialistes capable d'assurer des services touchant des objets et œuvres d'art de tous types de matériaux, de nature simple ou de très grande envergure, en atelier ou à l'extérieur, auprès d'une vaste clientèle. Cette approche synergique garantit l'utilisation optimale d'une précieuse expertise et d'infrastructures coûteuses. Le Centre dispose en effet de locaux et d'équipements spécialisés, sécuritaires et adaptés aux besoins des œuvres et des restaurateurs. Consultez la nétiquette du CCQ : https://www.mcc.gouv.qc.ca/index.php?id=5421#c31378

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-texas.jpeg
Frontier Texas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-conservation-quebec.jpeg
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Frontier Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frontier Texas in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) in 2026.

Incident History — Frontier Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frontier Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-texas.jpeg
Frontier Texas
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-conservation-quebec.jpeg
Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Frontier Texas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Frontier Texas company.

In the current year, Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company and Frontier Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company nor Frontier Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Frontier Texas company nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Frontier Texas company.

Frontier Texas company employs more people globally than Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Frontier Texas nor Centre de conservation du Québec (CCQ) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References