Comparison Overview

Frontier Culture Museum

VS

Clark Art Institute

Frontier Culture Museum

P.O. BOX 810, Staunton, Virginia 24402-0810, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Frontier Culture Museum is the biggest open-air living history museum in the Shenandoah Valley, as well as one of the highest rated family-friendly attractions and one of the top tourist destinations in Virginia. Costumed historical interpreters show the life and customs of the indigenous Native American tribes in Virginia, the arrival of the German, English and Irish settlers along the Great Wagon Road, and the painful journey of the enslaved Africans to the first permanent British colony in North America. Visitors may also interact with a blacksmith at an Irish Forge, woodworkers, tailors, and yarn spinners, and learn how the early settlers of America cooked and worked the land. The American journey starts here, with these early pioneers that inhabited America's First Frontier, the Blue Ridge Mountains, prior to the Westward Expansion of the 19th Century. The outdoor museum is located on 200 acres of land in the city of Staunton, Virginia, one of the South's Best Mountain Towns. As a cultural center, the museum features eleven historic exhibits, including traditional rural buildings from Europe, Africa, and America. It also hosts cultural events and special private events, such as weddings, receptions, board meetings and company retreats, and can accommodate both small and large groups of different school ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clark Art Institute

225 South Street, Williamstown, Massachusetts, 01267, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Clark is one of only a handful of institutions globally with a dual mission as an art museum and a distinguished center for research and higher education, dedicated to advancing and extending the public understanding of art. No other institution of its scale and character has such a complex and exhilarating mission—complex because interrelating the differing purposes of an art museum and a center for research and higher education is so challenging, and exhilarating because the possibilities and implications of this combination are so dynamic.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-culture-museum-va.jpeg
Frontier Culture Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Frontier Culture Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clark Art Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frontier Culture Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clark Art Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Frontier Culture Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frontier Culture Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clark Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frontier-culture-museum-va.jpeg
Frontier Culture Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Frontier Culture Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clark Art Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clark Art Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Frontier Culture Museum company.

In the current year, Clark Art Institute company and Frontier Culture Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor Frontier Culture Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor Frontier Culture Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor Frontier Culture Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum company nor Clark Art Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum company nor Clark Art Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clark Art Institute company employs more people globally than Frontier Culture Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Frontier Culture Museum nor Clark Art Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H