Comparison Overview

Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens

VS

ExplorationWorks!

Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens

2612 Lane Park Road, Birmingham, AL, 35223, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1962, Birmingham Botanical Gardens has welcomed visitors from across the region and around the world to explore the Gardens' botanical treasures; enjoy nature; and learn about plants, gardening, and the environment. The Gardens' 67.5 acres contain more than 12,000 plants showcased in two dozen gardens inspired by culture, nature, and collections. A facility of the Birmingham Park and Recreation Board, the Gardens is the result of a public/private partnership between the City of Birmingham and the nonprofit Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens, a mission-driven membership organization that seeks to protect, nurture, and share the wonders of the Gardens. You can help keep the Gardens growing by becoming a Friend today! Visit bbgardens.org/membership to explore seven membership levels (including newly enhanced member benefits). Join the Friends: https://www.bbgardens.org/levels.php Volunteer at the Gardens: https://bbgardens.org/volunteer.php Explore classes: https://bbgardens.org/adult-classes.php Read our blog: https://bbgardens.org/blog/ Donate: https://bbgardens.org/donate.php

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ExplorationWorks!

995 Carousel Way, Helena, Montana, US, 59601
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Around the world, interactive museums, science centers and children's museums provide exciting approaches to education. At the ExplorationWorks interactive musem, exhibits, programs, workshops, classes, and camps are available for kids, youths, families, seniors/elders, as well as school and community groups. ExplorationWorks helps meet community needs as an important partner with formal education, as a setting for informal learning, a place where families learn together, and as a catalyst and venue for community involvement in education for people from all ages, interests, and walks of life. Through early CommunityWorks “Museum Without Walls” programming and community-based center planning, strong partnerships developed with the City of Helena, Carroll College, Helena Public Schools, and others local and statewide organizations. Through collaborations with organizations that reach and serve at-risk and low-income populations our goal is to provide a center that is accessible, welcoming and inclusive of all people from varying social and economic backgrounds and experiences. Scholarship entry fees, memberships and program tuitions are always available.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-birmingham-botanical-gardens.jpeg
Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/explorationworks.jpeg
ExplorationWorks!
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ExplorationWorks!
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExplorationWorks! in 2026.

Incident History — Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ExplorationWorks! (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExplorationWorks! cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-birmingham-botanical-gardens.jpeg
Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/explorationworks.jpeg
ExplorationWorks!
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ExplorationWorks! company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ExplorationWorks! company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company.

In the current year, ExplorationWorks! company and Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ExplorationWorks! company nor Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ExplorationWorks! company nor Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ExplorationWorks! company nor Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company nor ExplorationWorks! company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company nor ExplorationWorks! company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens company employs more people globally than ExplorationWorks! company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Friends of Birmingham Botanical Gardens nor ExplorationWorks! holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N