Comparison Overview

Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman

VS

New Hampshire Public Defender

Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman

600 Lexington Ave # 15, New York, New York, US, 10022-6005
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Friedman & Wittenstein was founded over 25 years ago by Stuart I. Friedman and Andrew A. Wittenstein. The firm is dedicated to the traditional values of the legal profession: high quality and consistency. We represent large corporations, as well as individuals and small business enterprises. While we specialize in complex commercial litigation, we also provide services to our clients on an array of legal matters, including contracts, intellectual property issues, employment agreements, and corporate transactions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Hampshire Public Defender

10 Ferry St, Concord, 03301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The New Hampshire Public Defender was established in 1972 as a pilot project of New Hampshire Legal Assistance, and has existed as a stand-alone institution since 1985. Its sole purpose is to provide indigent defense services to citizens charged with crimes. The Program began with a single office in Concord. Over time, the Program opened satellite offices in other counties, and established administrative offices in its Merrimack County office, located in Concord, the state capital. In 1981, the Public Defender, in collaboration with the Franklin Pierce Law Center (now the University of New Hampshire School of Law), started the Appellate Defender Program, which provides indigent defense services to defendants who appeal their convictions to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Today, the Public Defender is an independent, non-profit, corporation with offices in every county. The Program works diligently to provide quality representation in a cost-effective manner to indigent defendants accused of crimes in all state courts. In addition to its attorneys, the Public Defender employs legal assistants, investigators, support staff, and information technology specialists, all of whom are dedicated to its core mission of serving indigent citizens accused of crimes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 190
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hampshire-public-defender.jpeg
New Hampshire Public Defender
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Hampshire Public Defender
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Hampshire Public Defender in 2025.

Incident History — Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Hampshire Public Defender (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Hampshire Public Defender cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hampshire-public-defender.jpeg
New Hampshire Public Defender
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to New Hampshire Public Defender company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New Hampshire Public Defender company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company.

In the current year, New Hampshire Public Defender company and Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Hampshire Public Defender company nor Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Hampshire Public Defender company nor Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Hampshire Public Defender company nor Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company nor New Hampshire Public Defender company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company nor New Hampshire Public Defender company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Hampshire Public Defender company employs more people globally than Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Friedman Wittenstein & Hochman nor New Hampshire Public Defender holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X