Comparison Overview

Fresh Living

VS

Touch Up Teak

Fresh Living

1395, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Fresh Living® er genuint opptatt av god design og kvalitet til lave priser. Rene linjer, godt håndverk og kvalitetsmaterialer er fellesnevneren for alt hva vi gjør. Mesteparten av våre møbler blir håndlaget og i nært samarbeid med våre leverandører sikrer vi at det skjer med størst mulig hensyn til både mennesker og miljø.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Touch Up Teak

1441 SW 30th Ave, Pompano Beach, 33069, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We are exotic wood specialists that restore and maintain many different species of hard and soft woods. Our expertise is in the art of wood work and care. Our goal is to provide a deeper, longer lasting clean for your furniture. We can help your investment last a lifetime. We hope this page will help you understand the service we provide, and connect you with our tried-and-true process for consistent quality care.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresh-living.jpeg
Fresh Living
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/touch-up-teak.jpeg
Touch Up Teak
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fresh Living
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Touch Up Teak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresh Living in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Touch Up Teak in 2025.

Incident History — Fresh Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresh Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Touch Up Teak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Touch Up Teak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresh-living.jpeg
Fresh Living
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/touch-up-teak.jpeg
Touch Up Teak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fresh Living company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Touch Up Teak company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Touch Up Teak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fresh Living company.

In the current year, Touch Up Teak company and Fresh Living company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Touch Up Teak company nor Fresh Living company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Touch Up Teak company nor Fresh Living company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Touch Up Teak company nor Fresh Living company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fresh Living company nor Touch Up Teak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fresh Living company nor Touch Up Teak company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fresh Living company employs more people globally than Touch Up Teak company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fresh Living nor Touch Up Teak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.