Comparison Overview

Fresenius Group

VS

Ascension

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, DE, 61352
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fresenius.com

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024, Fresenius generated €21.5 billion in annual revenue with around 176,000 employees (excluding Fresenius Medical Care). As a healthcare company focused on therapy, Fresenius offers system-critical products and services for leading therapies for the care of critically and chronically ill patients. Why work for Fresenius? At Fresenius, your career has purpose. As a global healthcare group, we’re dedicated to improving the lives of millions through better medicine—and we’re looking for people who want to make a real impact. Whether you’re an engineer, nurse, scientist, or business expert, Fresenius offers diverse career opportunities, the chance to grow across disciplines, and the satisfaction of contributing to something that truly matters. ➡ Learn more: careers.fresenius.com ➡ Follow us on Instagram: www.instagram.com/fresenius.group Imprint: https://www.fresenius.com/Imprint Data protection: https://www.fresenius.com/data-protection

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,137
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., Suite 450, St. Louis, MO, US, 63105
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ascension.org/

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY2025, Ascension provided $1.7 billion in care of persons living in poverty and other community benefit programs along with $1.8 billion of unreimbursed care for Medicare patients. Across 16 states and the District of Columbia, Ascension’s network encompasses approximately 99,000 associates, 22,300 aligned providers, 95 wholly owned or consolidated hospitals, and ownership interests in 26 additional hospitals through partnerships. Ascension also operates 30 senior living facilities and a variety of other care sites offering a range of healthcare services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 66,110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fresenius Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ascension
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Ascension has 19.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fresenius-se.jpeg
Fresenius Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Computer virus outbreak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability in third-party software
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fresenius Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascension company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ascension company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Fresenius Group company.

In the current year, Ascension company has reported more cyber incidents than Fresenius Group company.

Both Ascension company and Fresenius Group company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Ascension company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Fresenius Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ascension company nor Fresenius Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group company nor Ascension company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fresenius Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ascension company.

Ascension company employs more people globally than Fresenius Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fresenius Group nor Ascension holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References