Comparison Overview

French Creek Recovery Center

VS

Center for Hope and Healing

French Creek Recovery Center

535 Williamson Road, Meadville, 16335, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

French Creek Recovery Center was founded to provide high-quality, effective substance use disorder treatment. Our program combines 12-Step techniques with evidence-based practices that include family involvement, group and individual therapy, and holistic treatment. Located in Meadville, PA, just 40 miles south of Erie and 90 miles north of Pittsburgh, French Creek will provide addiction treatment where it’s needed. Many of our staff members are from the greater Crawford County area and are dedicated to improving the lives and community around them.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Center for Hope and Healing

3685 Motor Ave, Suite #240, Los Angeles, 90034, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Center for Hope and Healing, founded in 1991, is a nonprofit counseling center with offices in Los Angeles, CA. With a foundation in Attachment Theory and Spiritual Psychology, we serve individuals, couples, and families, providing low cost therapy to those who have experienced trauma and can't afford the treatment on their own at this time.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/french-creek-recovery-center.jpeg
French Creek Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Center for Hope and Healing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
French Creek Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Hope and Healing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for French Creek Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Hope and Healing in 2026.

Incident History — French Creek Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

French Creek Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Hope and Healing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Hope and Healing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/french-creek-recovery-center.jpeg
French Creek Recovery Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Center for Hope and Healing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Hope and Healing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to French Creek Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

French Creek Recovery Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Center for Hope and Healing company has not reported any.

In the current year, Center for Hope and Healing company and French Creek Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Hope and Healing company nor French Creek Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

French Creek Recovery Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Center for Hope and Healing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Center for Hope and Healing company nor French Creek Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center company nor Center for Hope and Healing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

French Creek Recovery Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Center for Hope and Healing company.

Center for Hope and Healing company employs more people globally than French Creek Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither French Creek Recovery Center nor Center for Hope and Healing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N